[Blind-sysadmins] Re: changed subject: synology

It's quirky to say the least, with a mixture of control types that cause at least one screenreader a bit of confusion, but it's definitely usable. On 1/23/2019 11:44 AM, Timothy Spaulding wrote:

Hi,

How do you like the interface to configure your Synology box? I am thinking of replacing my old QNAP with a Synology RackStation.

Tim

-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Hodgson Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 11:07 AM To: Blind sysadmins list Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Unraid VS. Windows server 2019 file server

Hi,

UnRaid I don't believe is free so you would have to purchase that. I personally use Synology for ages for the NAS and iSCSI target but that was just my personal preference. I don't really think it matters these days anyway as they all use very similar technology.

Bear in mind Unraid and some of the home like NAS boxes may enable more services (yes I did see an iSCSI box serving an iTunes server once).

Andrew. ________________________________________ From: Katherine M. Moss via Blind-sysadmins [blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] Sent: 23 January 2019 13:26 To: 'blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org' Cc: Katherine M. Moss Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Unraid VS. Windows server 2019 file server

Hi all, I've been scouring the internet for any information on this. I'm trying to set up a file server for my home lab, and while I do have Windows server 2019 via a visual studio subscription, somebody told me that Unraid is better for a file server from a security standpoint. States it's due to the compatibility and legacy support that Windows carries with it, though I firmly believed all of the unsecure storage options in Windows to be disabled by default? I can find nothing on the internet for enterprise-class networks stating that Unraid is surely a more secure option. (yes, it's a lab, but it's set up like a small business network to mimic what would be potentially found in the real world.) Also, when comparing Unraid to Windows storage spaces, seems like the two do the same thing. My current server is set up with a storage space, and I've never had any issues with him in terms of transfer speeds, performance, or anything else. Any input would be great. Most other folks I've gone to seem to be leaning towards Windows ... especially with Windows server core, which my server would be. Thanks for any input. Much appreciated. _______________________________________________

--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus