Hi. Nas4Free wasn't too bad either when I tried it. cheers, Mo. On 01/04/2017 13:37, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
Hi,
I thought OpenWRT was more of a router OS than a NAS OS, and ran on more router type hardware?
If we're talking about using more server type kit, we could always start looking at some of the larger options, starting from something like UnRaid (not used it myself but it was accessible when I tried it a year or so back), FreeNAS (had some issues with access when I used it), or even some of the Windows Server NAS options.
Andrew.
-----Original Message----- From: Blind-sysadmins [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of Jason White via Blind-sysadmins Sent: 01 April 2017 13:30 To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org Cc: Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] Looking for an accessible NAS
Any NAS that can run OpenWRT (http://www.openwrt.org/) should be very accessible once OpenWRT is installed on it. You can either use ssh to access the shell prompt, which I usually prefer, or use the Web interface, which seems to be quite accessible with a screen reader.
It can offer NFSv4, or SMB via Samba, thus giving you a choice of file systems. You also have a choice of Linux file systems for the hard drives or SSDs.
RAID should also be supported, but I haven't tried it, as I run OpenWRT on a device that primarily serves as the router for my home network.
_______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org https://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/listinfo/blind-sysadmins
_______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org https://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/listinfo/blind-sysadmins