From saemem@webgarden.ro Thu Jan 3 06:44:05 2019
From: saemem@webgarden.ro
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] How You Can Use LED TV In Positive Manner?
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 06:43:51 +0000
Message-ID: <154649783195.18438.8200557537148058151@mailman-web>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8023072204420786707=="
--===============8023072204420786707==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Those who are hooked to daily soap operas, or watch sports channels regularly=
cannot deny the importance of a good television. Thanks to the advances in t=
echnology, one of the best kinds of TV you can get yourself is an LED. An LED=
television is an LCD TV with an LED backlit display. A more advanced version=
of LCD televisions, any LED TV will give you a fantastic viewing experience.=
At Snapdeal, you will find various screen sizes to choose from. Here you can=
opt for an LED TV from brands like LG, Sony, Toshiba, Philips, Videocon, Sam=
sung, and others.
=20
LED TV Prices in India 2018 on Snapdeal.com
Sno
=20
Shop LED TVs Online at Low Prices
A television is one home appliance that is an investment. At Snapdeal you wil=
l find a wide array of LED televisions to choose from. They have thin bezels =
and will perfectly complement the decor of any living room. As they are light=
in weight, they can be mounted on the wall of your living room or bedroom. Y=
ou can also place them on a table with the help of a stand provided. Each TV =
is accompanied by a remote control that lets you operate the TV with ease. LE=
D televisions are usually chosen on the basis of the screen size. For a bigge=
r room, you may opt for an LED TV with a screen size that is 32 Inch LED TVs =
or between 33 Inch - 42 Inch LED TVs, or 43 Inch - 54 Inch LED TVs. For a sma=
ller room, like a children's room or a guestroom, you can opt for a LED telev=
ision that is 23 Inch & Below TVs or 24 Inch to 31 Inch TVs. Those who want t=
o indulge in a larger than life experience can choose very large televisions =
like a 55 Inch & Above LED TVs. An LED TV that has a screen size of 84 inches=
is sure to change the way you watch TV.
Impressive Features on LED TVs
LED televisions are equipped with mind-blowing features. There are full HD an=
d ultra HD televisions available. These televisions will ensure that you enjo=
y excellent picture quality. You can watch all the high-definition movies you=
want on these televisions. Your choice of a TV can also be based on the numb=
er of USB ports and HDMI ports present. These ports will allow you to connect=
DVD players and Blu-Ray players. With the Sound output option, you can also =
connect home theatres and other sound systems. Some of the televisions are eq=
uipped with features like Motion Control and Voice Control, and will also let=
you connect to social media websites.
In addition to LED TVs, you can also check out the range of Smart TVs, 3D TVs=
, Standard Televisions and gaming televisions. The LED TV price range is a po=
cket-friendly one, and most of these televisions come with a manufacturers wa=
rranty too. If you want to redefine your TV viewing experience, buy LED TVs o=
nline https://www=
.snapdeal.com/offers/deal-of-the-day from Snapdeal at economical prices,=
also check great deals & offer.
=20
Popular LED TVs By Brands on Snapdeal
Shop LED TVs by Brands =3D> SONY TVs | Samsung TVs | Micromax TVs | VU TVs | =
LG TVs | Panasonic TVs | Videocon TVs | Philips TVs | Onida TVs | Sansui TVs =
| Haier TVs | AOC TVs
--===============8023072204420786707==--
From codeofdusk@gmail.com Thu Jan 3 07:04:32 2019
From: Bill Dengler
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: How You Can Use LED TV In Positive Manner?
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 02:04:14 -0500
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <154649783195.18438.8200557537148058151@mailman-web>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4137463245434696702=="
--===============4137463245434696702==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yep, definitely useful for us...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 01:43, saemem(a)webgarden.ro wrote:
>=20
> Those who are hooked to daily soap operas, or watch sports channels regular=
ly cannot deny the importance of a good television. Thanks to the advances in=
technology, one of the best kinds of TV you can get yourself is an LED. An L=
ED television is an LCD TV with an LED backlit display. A more advanced versi=
on of LCD televisions, any LED TV will give you a fantastic viewing experienc=
e. At Snapdeal, you will find various screen sizes to choose from. Here you c=
an opt for an LED TV from brands like LG, Sony, Toshiba, Philips, Videocon, S=
amsung, and others.
>=20
>=20
> LED TV Prices in India 2018 on Snapdeal.com
> Sno
>=20
> Shop LED TVs Online at Low Prices
>=20
> A television is one home appliance that is an investment. At Snapdeal you w=
ill find a wide array of LED televisions to choose from. They have thin bezel=
s and will perfectly complement the decor of any living room. As they are lig=
ht in weight, they can be mounted on the wall of your living room or bedroom.=
You can also place them on a table with the help of a stand provided. Each T=
V is accompanied by a remote control that lets you operate the TV with ease. =
LED televisions are usually chosen on the basis of the screen size. For a big=
ger room, you may opt for an LED TV with a screen size that is 32 Inch LED TV=
s or between 33 Inch - 42 Inch LED TVs, or 43 Inch - 54 Inch LED TVs. For a s=
maller room, like a children's room or a guestroom, you can opt for a LED tel=
evision that is 23 Inch & Below TVs or 24 Inch to 31 Inch TVs. Those who want=
to indulge in a larger than life experience can choose very large television=
s like a 55 Inch & Above LED TVs. An LED TV that has a screen size of 84 inch=
es is sure to change the way you watch TV.
> Impressive Features on LED TVs
>=20
> LED televisions are equipped with mind-blowing features. There are full HD =
and ultra HD televisions available. These televisions will ensure that you en=
joy excellent picture quality. You can watch all the high-definition movies y=
ou want on these televisions. Your choice of a TV can also be based on the nu=
mber of USB ports and HDMI ports present. These ports will allow you to conne=
ct DVD players and Blu-Ray players. With the Sound output option, you can als=
o connect home theatres and other sound systems. Some of the televisions are =
equipped with features like Motion Control and Voice Control, and will also l=
et you connect to social media websites.
>=20
> In addition to LED TVs, you can also check out the range of Smart TVs, 3D T=
Vs, Standard Televisions and gaming televisions. The LED TV price range is a =
pocket-friendly one, and most of these televisions come with a manufacturers =
warranty too. If you want to redefine your TV viewing experience, buy LED TVs=
online https://w=
ww.snapdeal.com/offers/deal-of-the-day from Snapdeal at economical price=
s, also check great deals & offer.
>=20
>=20
> Popular LED TVs By Brands on Snapdeal
>=20
> Shop LED TVs by Brands =3D> SONY TVs | Samsung TVs | Micromax TVs | VU TVs =
| LG TVs | Panasonic TVs | Videocon TVs | Philips TVs | Onida TVs | Sansui TV=
s | Haier TVs | AOC TVs
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
--===============4137463245434696702==--
From thergert@vision-forward.org Thu Jan 3 19:59:28 2019
From: Troy Hergert
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Xcopy question
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:59:12 +0000
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4788154423092460607=="
--===============4788154423092460607==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello everyone,
I use a bat file with an xcopy command to copy the contents of a folder on on=
e nas drive to another. It does not tseem to copy new sub folders. My com=
mand line is as follows with I believe appropriate switches. Is xcopy the =
best route to go for this kind of procedure. I try to run the command every =
month or so to get a backup of my main utilities folder. It's around 150 Gb.=
New files within existing folders copy no problem but new subfolders and th=
eir contents do not. they seem to just get ignored.
Thanks for any advice.
xcopy "x:\utilities\*.*" y:\utilities\" /s /d /c /y
Troy
###
--===============4788154423092460607==--
From spaulding@icanbrew.com Thu Jan 3 20:55:31 2019
From: Timothy Spaulding
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 20:55:21 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CBL0PR11MB3476CB7D1711C30A31731B5BF38D0=40BL0PR11MB?=
=?utf-8?q?3476=2Enamprd11=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8056993328143580569=="
--===============8056993328143580569==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My favorite utility for something like this where you want the exact same con=
tents on y:\utilities as you have on x:\utilities is robocopy:
Robocopy x:\utilityes y:\utilities /mir
The /mir switch will mirror the source to the target.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Hergert =20
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:59 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Xcopy question
Hello everyone,
I use a bat file with an xcopy command to copy the contents of a folder on on=
e nas drive to another. It does not tseem to copy new sub folders. My com=
mand line is as follows with I believe appropriate switches. Is xcopy the =
best route to go for this kind of procedure. I try to run the command every =
month or so to get a backup of my main utilities folder. It's around 150 Gb.=
New files within existing folders copy no problem but new subfolders and th=
eir contents do not. they seem to just get ignored.
Thanks for any advice.
xcopy "x:\utilities\*.*" y:\utilities\" /s /d /c /y
Troy
###
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============8056993328143580569==--
From billy.irwin@outlook.com Thu Jan 3 21:57:08 2019
From: Billy Irwin
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 21:57:01 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CBL0PR11MB3476CB7D1711C30A31731B5BF38D0=40BL0PR11MB?=
=?utf-8?q?3476=2Enamprd11=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5963244651109583302=="
--===============5963244651109583302==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Try this below. The description of the flags is below.
xcopy c:\ d:\ /h/i/c/k/e/r/y
In this command data will be copied from c:\ to D:\, even folders and system =
files as well. Here's what the flags do:
list of 7 items
* /h copies hidden and system files also
* /i if destination does not exist and copying more than one file, assume tha=
t destination must be a directory
* /c continue copying even if error occurs
* /k copies attributes
* /e copies directories and subdirectories, including empty ones
* /r overwrites read-only files
* /y suppress prompting to confirm whether you want to overwrite a file
list end
Best,
Billy
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Hergert =20
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:59 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Xcopy question
Hello everyone,
I use a bat file with an xcopy command to copy the contents of a folder on on=
e nas drive to another. It does not tseem to copy new sub folders. My com=
mand line is as follows with I believe appropriate switches. Is xcopy the =
best route to go for this kind of procedure. I try to run the command every =
month or so to get a backup of my main utilities folder. It's around 150 Gb.=
New files within existing folders copy no problem but new subfolders and th=
eir contents do not. they seem to just get ignored.
Thanks for any advice.
xcopy "x:\utilities\*.*" y:\utilities\" /s /d /c /y
Troy
###
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============5963244651109583302==--
From jason@jasonjgw.net Thu Jan 3 23:09:30 2019
From: Jason White
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 18:09:17 -0500
Message-ID: <01b801d4a3b9$5a96da60$0fc48f20$@jasonjgw.net>
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0556907223483771909=="
--===============0556907223483771909==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
That would be my solution as well. Another alternative is rsync, but I'm not
sure whether it can preserve file attributes on NTFS file systems. It's the
standard solution on UNIX (including Linux and Mac) systems.
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Spaulding
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:55 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
My favorite utility for something like this where you want the exact same
contents on y:\utilities as you have on x:\utilities is robocopy:
Robocopy x:\utilityes y:\utilities /mir
The /mir switch will mirror the source to the target.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Hergert
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:59 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Xcopy question
Hello everyone,
I use a bat file with an xcopy command to copy the contents of a folder on
one nas drive to another. It does not tseem to copy new sub folders. My
command line is as follows with I believe appropriate switches. Is xcopy
the best route to go for this kind of procedure. I try to run the command
every month or so to get a backup of my main utilities folder. It's around
150 Gb. New files within existing folders copy no problem but new
subfolders and their contents do not. they seem to just get ignored.
Thanks for any advice.
xcopy "x:\utilities\*.*" y:\utilities\" /s /d /c /y
Troy
###
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
--===============0556907223483771909==--
From thergert@vision-forward.org Fri Jan 4 00:35:11 2019
From: Troy Hergert
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:34:59 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDM6PR10MB29387AAF5BC0CBCA89943AA4EB8D0=40DM6PR10MB?=
=?utf-8?q?2938=2Enamprd10=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3881286835699559768=="
--===============3881286835699559768==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks,
These switches made the difference. I'm also interested in trying out roboco=
py. Thanks for the help everyone.
###
-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Irwin =20
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:57 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Try this below. The description of the flags is below.
xcopy c:\ d:\ /h/i/c/k/e/r/y
In this command data will be copied from c:\ to D:\, even folders and system =
files as well. Here's what the flags do:
list of 7 items
* /h copies hidden and system files also
* /i if destination does not exist and copying more than one file, assume tha=
t destination must be a directory
* /c continue copying even if error occurs
* /k copies attributes
* /e copies directories and subdirectories, including empty ones
* /r overwrites read-only files
* /y suppress prompting to confirm whether you want to overwrite a file list =
end
Best,
Billy
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Hergert
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:59 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Xcopy question
Hello everyone,
I use a bat file with an xcopy command to copy the contents of a folder on on=
e nas drive to another. It does not tseem to copy new sub folders. My com=
mand line is as follows with I believe appropriate switches. Is xcopy the =
best route to go for this kind of procedure. I try to run the command every =
month or so to get a backup of my main utilities folder. It's around 150 Gb.=
New files within existing folders copy no problem but new subfolders and th=
eir contents do not. they seem to just get ignored.
Thanks for any advice.
xcopy "x:\utilities\*.*" y:\utilities\" /s /d /c /y
Troy
###
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============3881286835699559768==--
From d@digitaldarragh.com Fri Jan 4 09:47:49 2019
From: Darragh =?utf-8?q?=C3=93_H=C3=A9iligh?=
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: How You Can Use LED TV In Positive Manner?
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 09:47:37 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3597915492526913644=="
--===============3597915492526913644==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wouldn't ordinarily post this on this list but just because the topic was r=
aised recently, I was really surprised to find that my newly purchased Samsun=
g television has a fully functional screen reader.=20
I've recorded a quick intro video about this over on my website at www.digita=
ldarragh.com/blog if anyone is interested.=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dengler =20
Sent: Thursday 3 January 2019 07:04
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: How You Can Use LED TV In Positive Manner?
Yep, definitely useful for us...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 3, 2019, at 01:43, saemem(a)webgarden.ro wrote:
>=20
> Those who are hooked to daily soap operas, or watch sports channels regular=
ly cannot deny the importance of a good television. Thanks to the advances in=
technology, one of the best kinds of TV you can get yourself is an LED. An L=
ED television is an LCD TV with an LED backlit display. A more advanced versi=
on of LCD televisions, any LED TV will give you a fantastic viewing experienc=
e. At Snapdeal, you will find various screen sizes to choose from. Here you c=
an opt for an LED TV from brands like LG, Sony, Toshiba, Philips, Videocon, S=
amsung, and others.
>=20
>=20
> LED TV Prices in India 2018 on Snapdeal.com Sno
>=20
> Shop LED TVs Online at Low Prices
>=20
> A television is one home appliance that is an investment. At Snapdeal you w=
ill find a wide array of LED televisions to choose from. They have thin bezel=
s and will perfectly complement the decor of any living room. As they are lig=
ht in weight, they can be mounted on the wall of your living room or bedroom.=
You can also place them on a table with the help of a stand provided. Each T=
V is accompanied by a remote control that lets you operate the TV with ease. =
LED televisions are usually chosen on the basis of the screen size. For a big=
ger room, you may opt for an LED TV with a screen size that is 32 Inch LED TV=
s or between 33 Inch - 42 Inch LED TVs, or 43 Inch - 54 Inch LED TVs. For a s=
maller room, like a children's room or a guestroom, you can opt for a LED tel=
evision that is 23 Inch & Below TVs or 24 Inch to 31 Inch TVs. Those who want=
to indulge in a larger than life experience can choose very large television=
s like a 55 Inch & Above LED TVs. An LED TV that has a screen size of 84 inch=
es is sure to change the way you watch TV.
> Impressive Features on LED TVs
>=20
> LED televisions are equipped with mind-blowing features. There are full HD =
and ultra HD televisions available. These televisions will ensure that you en=
joy excellent picture quality. You can watch all the high-definition movies y=
ou want on these televisions. Your choice of a TV can also be based on the nu=
mber of USB ports and HDMI ports present. These ports will allow you to conne=
ct DVD players and Blu-Ray players. With the Sound output option, you can als=
o connect home theatres and other sound systems. Some of the televisions are =
equipped with features like Motion Control and Voice Control, and will also l=
et you connect to social media websites.
>=20
> In addition to LED TVs, you can also check out the range of Smart TVs, 3D T=
Vs, Standard Televisions and gaming televisions. The LED TV price range is a =
pocket-friendly one, and most of these televisions come with a manufacturers =
warranty too. If you want to redefine your TV viewing experience, buy LED TVs=
online https://w=
ww.snapdeal.com/offers/deal-of-the-day from Snapdeal at economical price=
s, also check great deals & offer.
>=20
>=20
> Popular LED TVs By Brands on Snapdeal
>=20
> Shop LED TVs by Brands =3D> SONY TVs | Samsung TVs | Micromax TVs | VU=20
> TVs | LG TVs | Panasonic TVs | Videocon TVs | Philips TVs | Onida TVs=20
> | Sansui TVs | Haier TVs | AOC TVs=20
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============3597915492526913644==--
From KMoss@WinterHillSolutions.com Fri Jan 4 12:14:12 2019
From: "Katherine M. Moss"
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 12:13:58 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CBL0PR11MB347660EC6C3195B01E251D89F38E0=40BL0PR11MB?=
=?utf-8?q?3476=2Enamprd11=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4112332683888499137=="
--===============4112332683888499137==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You can also use the copy items syntax from Powershell. That's what I would d=
o.
Get Outlook for Android
________________________________
From: Troy Hergert
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 7:34:59 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Thanks,
These switches made the difference. I'm also interested in trying out roboco=
py. Thanks for the help everyone.
###
-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Irwin
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:57 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Try this below. The description of the flags is below.
xcopy c:\ d:\ /h/i/c/k/e/r/y
In this command data will be copied from c:\ to D:\, even folders and system =
files as well. Here's what the flags do:
list of 7 items
* /h copies hidden and system files also
* /i if destination does not exist and copying more than one file, assume tha=
t destination must be a directory
* /c continue copying even if error occurs
* /k copies attributes
* /e copies directories and subdirectories, including empty ones
* /r overwrites read-only files
* /y suppress prompting to confirm whether you want to overwrite a file list =
end
Best,
Billy
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Hergert
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:59 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Xcopy question
Hello everyone,
I use a bat file with an xcopy command to copy the contents of a folder on on=
e nas drive to another. It does not tseem to copy new sub folders. My com=
mand line is as follows with I believe appropriate switches. Is xcopy the =
best route to go for this kind of procedure. I try to run the command every =
month or so to get a backup of my main utilities folder. It's around 150 Gb.=
New files within existing folders copy no problem but new subfolders and th=
eir contents do not. they seem to just get ignored.
Thanks for any advice.
xcopy "x:\utilities\*.*" y:\utilities\" /s /d /c /y
Troy
###
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============4112332683888499137==--
From jason@jasonjgw.net Fri Jan 4 13:26:03 2019
From: Jason White
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 08:25:48 -0500
Message-ID: <021c01d4a431$02045c60$060d1520$@jasonjgw.net>
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CBN7PR06MB41145698DE61A8333D4EE65FA48E0=40BN7PR06MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4114=2Enamprd06=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1477515045041556569=="
--===============1477515045041556569==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
That's also an excellent solution, with the -recurse parameter. If you care
about preserving file attributes, permissions, etc., this may not be what
you need.
-----Original Message-----
From: Katherine M. Moss via Blind-sysadmins
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 7:14 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Cc: Katherine M. Moss
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
You can also use the copy items syntax from Powershell. That's what I would
do.
Get Outlook for Android
________________________________
From: Troy Hergert
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 7:34:59 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Thanks,
These switches made the difference. I'm also interested in trying out
robocopy. Thanks for the help everyone.
###
-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Irwin
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:57 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Xcopy question
Try this below. The description of the flags is below.
xcopy c:\ d:\ /h/i/c/k/e/r/y
In this command data will be copied from c:\ to D:\, even folders and system
files as well. Here's what the flags do:
list of 7 items
* /h copies hidden and system files also
* /i if destination does not exist and copying more than one file, assume
that destination must be a directory
* /c continue copying even if error occurs
* /k copies attributes
* /e copies directories and subdirectories, including empty ones
* /r overwrites read-only files
* /y suppress prompting to confirm whether you want to overwrite a file list
end
Best,
Billy
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Hergert
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:59 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Xcopy question
Hello everyone,
I use a bat file with an xcopy command to copy the contents of a folder on
one nas drive to another. It does not tseem to copy new sub folders. My
command line is as follows with I believe appropriate switches. Is xcopy
the best route to go for this kind of procedure. I try to run the command
every month or so to get a backup of my main utilities folder. It's around
150 Gb. New files within existing folders copy no problem but new
subfolders and their contents do not. they seem to just get ignored.
Thanks for any advice.
xcopy "x:\utilities\*.*" y:\utilities\" /s /d /c /y
Troy
###
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
--===============1477515045041556569==--
From dave.mehler@gmail.com Fri Jan 4 18:57:11 2019
From: David Mehler
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] chillispot hotspot
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:57:01 -0500
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6013384506430309277=="
--===============6013384506430309277==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello,
Does anyone use chillispot as a hotspot captive portal? If so, where
are the files to edit/change interface options, things like for
example the terms of service?
Thanks.
Dave.
--===============6013384506430309277==--
From dave.mehler@gmail.com Sat Jan 5 17:55:45 2019
From: David Mehler
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject:
[Blind-sysadmins] Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ Setup
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 12:55:29 -0500
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1534445865981732403=="
--===============1534445865981732403==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
I'm trying to update my server security. I'm wanting to implement the
OWASP recommended Advanced+ setup. For reference that is:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/TLS_Cipher_String_Cheat_Sheet
My client compatibility I thought was good, using firefox 57, chrome
the latest I just updated it from ninite, and ie11 on win10, and
Aquamail as an android client.
My tls cipher suite I'm using for the advanced+ configuration is:
DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA3=
84:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
Having set this nothing is working, getting tls connection errors can
not negotiate a compatible protocol or cipher. This tells me the
protocols and ciphers are to restrictive, I was under the impression
this should work. Does anyone have this implemented? Can you make
exceptions for certain clients I'll go that way if I have to.
The services I'm trying to get going are Apache v2.4, Postfix 3.3, and
dovecot 2.3. My openssl version is 1.02q 20 NOV. 2018.
Suggestions welcome.
Thanks.
Dave.
--===============1534445865981732403==--
From andrew@hodgson.io Sat Jan 5 23:52:16 2019
From: Andrew Hodgson
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject:
[Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ Setup
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 23:52:02 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7456474737702181689=="
--===============7456474737702181689==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I would check you are using the correct SSL versions as well as the A+ needs =
TLS 1.2 with those ciphers so any other TLS version wouldn't work.
You cannot make exceptions for specific clients as the handshake is done as t=
he first step so the client isn't even identified. You can of course configu=
re the strings in different servers differently. I think you may be able to =
get away with B now on web servers but if you are dealing with other protocol=
s (especially IMAP/S and SMTP/S) I would set these to C.
Which reminds me I need to check my own list as it is out of date.
Andrew.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Mehler =20
Sent: 05 January 2019 17:55
To: blind-sysadmins
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ S=
etup
Hello,
I'm trying to update my server security. I'm wanting to implement the OWASP r=
ecommended Advanced+ setup. For reference that is:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/TLS_Cipher_String_Cheat_Sheet
My client compatibility I thought was good, using firefox 57, chrome the late=
st I just updated it from ninite, and ie11 on win10, and Aquamail as an andro=
id client.
My tls cipher suite I'm using for the advanced+ configuration is:
DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA3=
84:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
Having set this nothing is working, getting tls connection errors can not neg=
otiate a compatible protocol or cipher. This tells me the protocols and ciphe=
rs are to restrictive, I was under the impression this should work. Does anyo=
ne have this implemented? Can you make exceptions for certain clients I'll go=
that way if I have to.
The services I'm trying to get going are Apache v2.4, Postfix 3.3, and doveco=
t 2.3. My openssl version is 1.02q 20 NOV. 2018.
Suggestions welcome.
Thanks.
Dave.
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============7456474737702181689==--
From andrew@hodgson.io Sun Jan 6 00:08:31 2019
From: Andrew Hodgson
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject:
[Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ Setup
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 00:08:17 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB6PR0801MB1880B68DCDA576930B9C3152AF8F0=40DB6PR08?=
=?utf-8?q?01MB1880=2Eeurprd08=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6048132290863527760=="
--===============6048132290863527760==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
FWIW I just implemented the cipher suites for B (broad compatibility) and got=
a higher score on the Qualys SSL Labs test (got A+ both times but higher sco=
re on secure ciphers second time). I think that B should be enough unless yo=
u want to really start locking down. I wouldn't go any higher than B on a pu=
blic web server anyway.
Andrew.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Hodgson =20
Sent: 05 January 2019 23:52
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advance=
d+ Setup
Hi,
I would check you are using the correct SSL versions as well as the A+ needs =
TLS 1.2 with those ciphers so any other TLS version wouldn't work.
You cannot make exceptions for specific clients as the handshake is done as t=
he first step so the client isn't even identified. You can of course configu=
re the strings in different servers differently. I think you may be able to =
get away with B now on web servers but if you are dealing with other protocol=
s (especially IMAP/S and SMTP/S) I would set these to C.
Which reminds me I need to check my own list as it is out of date.
Andrew.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Mehler =20
Sent: 05 January 2019 17:55
To: blind-sysadmins
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ S=
etup
Hello,
I'm trying to update my server security. I'm wanting to implement the OWASP r=
ecommended Advanced+ setup. For reference that is:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/TLS_Cipher_String_Cheat_Sheet
My client compatibility I thought was good, using firefox 57, chrome the late=
st I just updated it from ninite, and ie11 on win10, and Aquamail as an andro=
id client.
My tls cipher suite I'm using for the advanced+ configuration is:
DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA3=
84:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
Having set this nothing is working, getting tls connection errors can not neg=
otiate a compatible protocol or cipher. This tells me the protocols and ciphe=
rs are to restrictive, I was under the impression this should work. Does anyo=
ne have this implemented? Can you make exceptions for certain clients I'll go=
that way if I have to.
The services I'm trying to get going are Apache v2.4, Postfix 3.3, and doveco=
t 2.3. My openssl version is 1.02q 20 NOV. 2018.
Suggestions welcome.
Thanks.
Dave.
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============6048132290863527760==--
From dave.mehler@gmail.com Sun Jan 6 00:19:17 2019
From: David Mehler
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject:
[Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ Setup
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2019 19:19:05 -0500
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB6PR0801MB1880DB0BDEA8EE2EB41F30F9AF880=40DB6PR08?=
=?utf-8?q?01MB1880=2Eeurprd08=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1966329886140214820=="
--===============1966329886140214820==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Andrew,
Thanks for your reply. My openssl version is 1.02q of November 2018.
The ciphers I'm using were from the A+ OWASP. Clients are Android 7.1
Aquamail, and IE11.
Andrew, where are you getting your ciphers from? They seem more
advanced yours are working, and the article i'm referencing. I'd like
to go with A+ or A if doable.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 1/5/19, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> FWIW I just implemented the cipher suites for B (broad compatibility) and
> got a higher score on the Qualys SSL Labs test (got A+ both times but higher
> score on secure ciphers second time). I think that B should be enough
> unless you want to really start locking down. I wouldn't go any higher than
> B on a public web server anyway.
>
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Hodgson
> Sent: 05 January 2019 23:52
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP
> Advanced+ Setup
>
> Hi,
>
> I would check you are using the correct SSL versions as well as the A+ needs
> TLS 1.2 with those ciphers so any other TLS version wouldn't work.
>
> You cannot make exceptions for specific clients as the handshake is done as
> the first step so the client isn't even identified. You can of course
> configure the strings in different servers differently. I think you may be
> able to get away with B now on web servers but if you are dealing with other
> protocols (especially IMAP/S and SMTP/S) I would set these to C.
>
> Which reminds me I need to check my own list as it is out of date.
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Mehler
> Sent: 05 January 2019 17:55
> To: blind-sysadmins
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+
> Setup
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to update my server security. I'm wanting to implement the OWASP
> recommended Advanced+ setup. For reference that is:
>
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/TLS_Cipher_String_Cheat_Sheet
>
> My client compatibility I thought was good, using firefox 57, chrome the
> latest I just updated it from ninite, and ie11 on win10, and Aquamail as an
> android client.
>
> My tls cipher suite I'm using for the advanced+ configuration is:
>
> DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SH=
A384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
>
> Having set this nothing is working, getting tls connection errors can not
> negotiate a compatible protocol or cipher. This tells me the protocols and
> ciphers are to restrictive, I was under the impression this should work.
> Does anyone have this implemented? Can you make exceptions for certain
> clients I'll go that way if I have to.
>
> The services I'm trying to get going are Apache v2.4, Postfix 3.3, and
> dovecot 2.3. My openssl version is 1.02q 20 NOV. 2018.
>
> Suggestions welcome.
>
> Thanks.
> Dave.
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>
--===============1966329886140214820==--
From andrew@hodgson.io Sun Jan 6 17:43:57 2019
From: Andrew Hodgson
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject:
[Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ Setup
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 17:43:43 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1576105243970323761=="
--===============1576105243970323761==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
As I said I put my settings to the B grade which I think is strong enough wit=
hout disabling clients. I wouldn't go higher than B when configuring hardeni=
ng at work in any case.
In terms of the SSL versions I am not talking about OpenSSL version but the v=
ersion of the TLS protocol you are using, if you are using A+ or A you need t=
o explicitly state only allowing TLS 1.2 and nothing else, if you specify oth=
er TLS versions it may mismatch.
Andrew.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Mehler =20
Sent: 06 January 2019 00:19
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advance=
d+ Setup
Hello Andrew,
Thanks for your reply. My openssl version is 1.02q of November 2018.
The ciphers I'm using were from the A+ OWASP. Clients are Android 7.1 Aquamai=
l, and IE11.
Andrew, where are you getting your ciphers from? They seem more advanced your=
s are working, and the article i'm referencing. I'd like to go with A+ or A i=
f doable.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 1/5/19, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> FWIW I just implemented the cipher suites for B (broad compatibility)=20
> and got a higher score on the Qualys SSL Labs test (got A+ both times=20
> but higher score on secure ciphers second time). I think that B=20
> should be enough unless you want to really start locking down. I=20
> wouldn't go any higher than B on a public web server anyway.
>
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Hodgson
> Sent: 05 January 2019 23:52
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP
> Advanced+ Setup
>
> Hi,
>
> I would check you are using the correct SSL versions as well as the A+=20
> needs TLS 1.2 with those ciphers so any other TLS version wouldn't work.
>
> You cannot make exceptions for specific clients as the handshake is=20
> done as the first step so the client isn't even identified. You can=20
> of course configure the strings in different servers differently. I=20
> think you may be able to get away with B now on web servers but if you=20
> are dealing with other protocols (especially IMAP/S and SMTP/S) I would set=
these to C.
>
> Which reminds me I need to check my own list as it is out of date.
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Mehler
> Sent: 05 January 2019 17:55
> To: blind-sysadmins
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Implementing Encryption with the OWASP=20
> Advanced+ Setup
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to update my server security. I'm wanting to implement the=20
> OWASP recommended Advanced+ setup. For reference that is:
>
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/TLS_Cipher_String_Cheat_Sheet
>
> My client compatibility I thought was good, using firefox 57, chrome=20
> the latest I just updated it from ninite, and ie11 on win10, and=20
> Aquamail as an android client.
>
> My tls cipher suite I'm using for the advanced+ configuration is:
>
> DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-G
> CM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
>
> Having set this nothing is working, getting tls connection errors can=20
> not negotiate a compatible protocol or cipher. This tells me the=20
> protocols and ciphers are to restrictive, I was under the impression this s=
hould work.
> Does anyone have this implemented? Can you make exceptions for certain=20
> clients I'll go that way if I have to.
>
> The services I'm trying to get going are Apache v2.4, Postfix 3.3, and=20
> dovecot 2.3. My openssl version is 1.02q 20 NOV. 2018.
>
> Suggestions welcome.
>
> Thanks.
> Dave.
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============1576105243970323761==--
From dave.mehler@gmail.com Mon Jan 7 02:44:59 2019
From: David Mehler
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject:
[Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ Setup
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 21:44:42 -0500
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB6PR0801MB18804F608749FF522225B640AF880=40DB6PR08?=
=?utf-8?q?01MB1880=2Eeurprd08=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4972889077590344994=="
--===============4972889077590344994==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello Andrew,
Thanks. Does b only allow TLS 1.2? That's the only thing I am wanting,
can I get a look at your settings? I'd like to compare yours to mine?
Thanks.
Dave.
On 1/6/19, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I said I put my settings to the B grade which I think is strong enough
> without disabling clients. I wouldn't go higher than B when configuring
> hardening at work in any case.
>
> In terms of the SSL versions I am not talking about OpenSSL version but the
> version of the TLS protocol you are using, if you are using A+ or A you need
> to explicitly state only allowing TLS 1.2 and nothing else, if you specify
> other TLS versions it may mismatch.
>
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Mehler
> Sent: 06 January 2019 00:19
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP
> Advanced+ Setup
>
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your reply. My openssl version is 1.02q of November 2018.
> The ciphers I'm using were from the A+ OWASP. Clients are Android 7.1
> Aquamail, and IE11.
>
> Andrew, where are you getting your ciphers from? They seem more advanced
> yours are working, and the article i'm referencing. I'd like to go with A+
> or A if doable.
>
> Thanks.
> Dave.
>
>
> On 1/5/19, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>> FWIW I just implemented the cipher suites for B (broad compatibility)
>> and got a higher score on the Qualys SSL Labs test (got A+ both times
>> but higher score on secure ciphers second time). I think that B
>> should be enough unless you want to really start locking down. I
>> wouldn't go any higher than B on a public web server anyway.
>>
>> Andrew.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Hodgson
>> Sent: 05 January 2019 23:52
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP
>> Advanced+ Setup
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would check you are using the correct SSL versions as well as the A+
>> needs TLS 1.2 with those ciphers so any other TLS version wouldn't work.
>>
>> You cannot make exceptions for specific clients as the handshake is
>> done as the first step so the client isn't even identified. You can
>> of course configure the strings in different servers differently. I
>> think you may be able to get away with B now on web servers but if you
>> are dealing with other protocols (especially IMAP/S and SMTP/S) I would
>> set these to C.
>>
>> Which reminds me I need to check my own list as it is out of date.
>> Andrew.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Mehler
>> Sent: 05 January 2019 17:55
>> To: blind-sysadmins
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Implementing Encryption with the OWASP
>> Advanced+ Setup
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to update my server security. I'm wanting to implement the
>> OWASP recommended Advanced+ setup. For reference that is:
>>
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/TLS_Cipher_String_Cheat_Sheet
>>
>> My client compatibility I thought was good, using firefox 57, chrome
>> the latest I just updated it from ninite, and ie11 on win10, and
>> Aquamail as an android client.
>>
>> My tls cipher suite I'm using for the advanced+ configuration is:
>>
>> DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-G
>> CM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
>>
>> Having set this nothing is working, getting tls connection errors can
>> not negotiate a compatible protocol or cipher. This tells me the
>> protocols and ciphers are to restrictive, I was under the impression this
>> should work.
>> Does anyone have this implemented? Can you make exceptions for certain
>> clients I'll go that way if I have to.
>>
>> The services I'm trying to get going are Apache v2.4, Postfix 3.3, and
>> dovecot 2.3. My openssl version is 1.02q 20 NOV. 2018.
>>
>> Suggestions welcome.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Dave.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>
--===============4972889077590344994==--
From andrew@hodgson.io Mon Jan 7 11:34:57 2019
From: Andrew Hodgson
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject:
[Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advanced+ Setup
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 11:34:39 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7345490513179526608=="
--===============7345490513179526608==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I am Nginx over here so here is my config which is grade B:
server {
listen 443 ssl;
listen [::]:443 ssl;
[...]
ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/samwise.hodgsonfamily.org/fullchain.p=
em;
ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/samwise.hodgsonfamily.org/privkey=
.pem;
ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2;
ssl_ciphers DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-A=
ES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AE=
S128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-=
SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA;
ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;
add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=3D31536000; includeSubdomains=
";
ssl_dhparam /etc/ssl/private/dhparam.pem;
ssl_stapling on;
ssl_stapling_verify on;
If you want A or A+ you need to ensure you are enabling TLS 1.2 only and noth=
ing else.
Andrew.
________________________________________
From: David Mehler [dave.mehler(a)gmail.com]
Sent: 07 January 2019 02:44
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP Advance=
d+ Setup
Hello Andrew,
Thanks. Does b only allow TLS 1.2? That's the only thing I am wanting,
can I get a look at your settings? I'd like to compare yours to mine?
Thanks.
Dave.
On 1/6/19, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I said I put my settings to the B grade which I think is strong enough
> without disabling clients. I wouldn't go higher than B when configuring
> hardening at work in any case.
>
> In terms of the SSL versions I am not talking about OpenSSL version but the
> version of the TLS protocol you are using, if you are using A+ or A you need
> to explicitly state only allowing TLS 1.2 and nothing else, if you specify
> other TLS versions it may mismatch.
>
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Mehler
> Sent: 06 January 2019 00:19
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP
> Advanced+ Setup
>
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your reply. My openssl version is 1.02q of November 2018.
> The ciphers I'm using were from the A+ OWASP. Clients are Android 7.1
> Aquamail, and IE11.
>
> Andrew, where are you getting your ciphers from? They seem more advanced
> yours are working, and the article i'm referencing. I'd like to go with A+
> or A if doable.
>
> Thanks.
> Dave.
>
>
> On 1/5/19, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>> FWIW I just implemented the cipher suites for B (broad compatibility)
>> and got a higher score on the Qualys SSL Labs test (got A+ both times
>> but higher score on secure ciphers second time). I think that B
>> should be enough unless you want to really start locking down. I
>> wouldn't go any higher than B on a public web server anyway.
>>
>> Andrew.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Hodgson
>> Sent: 05 January 2019 23:52
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Implementing Encryption with the OWASP
>> Advanced+ Setup
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would check you are using the correct SSL versions as well as the A+
>> needs TLS 1.2 with those ciphers so any other TLS version wouldn't work.
>>
>> You cannot make exceptions for specific clients as the handshake is
>> done as the first step so the client isn't even identified. You can
>> of course configure the strings in different servers differently. I
>> think you may be able to get away with B now on web servers but if you
>> are dealing with other protocols (especially IMAP/S and SMTP/S) I would
>> set these to C.
>>
>> Which reminds me I need to check my own list as it is out of date.
>> Andrew.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Mehler
>> Sent: 05 January 2019 17:55
>> To: blind-sysadmins
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Implementing Encryption with the OWASP
>> Advanced+ Setup
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to update my server security. I'm wanting to implement the
>> OWASP recommended Advanced+ setup. For reference that is:
>>
>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/TLS_Cipher_String_Cheat_Sheet
>>
>> My client compatibility I thought was good, using firefox 57, chrome
>> the latest I just updated it from ninite, and ie11 on win10, and
>> Aquamail as an android client.
>>
>> My tls cipher suite I'm using for the advanced+ configuration is:
>>
>> DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-G
>> CM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
>>
>> Having set this nothing is working, getting tls connection errors can
>> not negotiate a compatible protocol or cipher. This tells me the
>> protocols and ciphers are to restrictive, I was under the impression this
>> should work.
>> Does anyone have this implemented? Can you make exceptions for certain
>> clients I'll go that way if I have to.
>>
>> The services I'm trying to get going are Apache v2.4, Postfix 3.3, and
>> dovecot 2.3. My openssl version is 1.02q 20 NOV. 2018.
>>
>> Suggestions welcome.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Dave.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============7345490513179526608==--
From mhysnm1964@gmail.com Sun Jan 13 23:26:20 2019
From: mhysnm1964@gmail.com
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:26:23 +1100
Message-ID: <00c201d4ab97$67431d10$35c95730$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9142656505545256653=="
--===============9142656505545256653==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
All,
The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original
podcast is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large
number of negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired
in windows. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below
podcast does an excellent job in highlighting the errors.
http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurrott-is
-so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
--===============9142656505545256653==--
From d@digitaldarragh.com Mon Jan 14 11:16:39 2019
From: Darragh =?utf-8?q?=C3=93_H=C3=A9iligh?=
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:16:23 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <00c201d4ab97$67431d10$35c95730$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6893944164309025625=="
--===============6893944164309025625==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for highlighting this.=20
I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was very =
wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wednes=
day.=20
-----Original Message-----
From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com =20
Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
All,
=20
The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podcast=
is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of n=
egative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows. =
They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an exc=
ellent job in highlighting the errors.
=20
http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurrott-is
-so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
=20
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============6893944164309025625==--
From andrew@hodgson.io Mon Jan 14 11:21:09 2019
From: Andrew Hodgson
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:21:01 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB7PR01MB4299B04601622BA46AE7CBDBC0800=40DB7PR01MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4299=2Eeurprd01=2Eprod=2Eexchangelabs=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2705422041292814256=="
--===============2705422041292814256==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me a c=
ouple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
Andrew.
________________________________________
From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Thanks for highlighting this.
I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was very =
wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wednes=
day.
-----Original Message-----
From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
All,
The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podcast=
is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of n=
egative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows. =
They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an exc=
ellent job in highlighting the errors.
http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurrott-is
-so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============2705422041292814256==--
From d@digitaldarragh.com Mon Jan 14 12:27:02 2019
From: Darragh =?utf-8?q?=C3=93_H=C3=A9iligh?=
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:26:56 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB6PR0801MB18804E8308EBA4763E688D59AF800=40DB6PR08?=
=?utf-8?q?01MB1880=2Eeurprd08=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2334433017941245527=="
--===============2334433017941245527==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All he's said is he's completely uninterested in this.=20
This isn't surprising. It's normal for him not to respond well to constructiv=
e feedback. So I(a)m hoping Leo and Mary Joe will speak to him and maybe we'l=
l have some clarification on Wednesday.=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Hodgson =20
Sent: Monday 14 January 2019 11:21
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Hi,
Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me a c=
ouple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
Andrew.
________________________________________
From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Thanks for highlighting this.
I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was very =
wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wednes=
day.
-----Original Message-----
From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
All,
The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podcast=
is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of n=
egative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows. =
They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an exc=
ellent job in highlighting the errors.
http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurrott-is
-so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============2334433017941245527==--
From sm@noisynotes.com Mon Jan 14 15:19:31 2019
From: Steve Matzura
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:17:05 -0500
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <00c201d4ab97$67431d10$35c95730$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3286891523590050378=="
--===============3286891523590050378==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I think what the WW603 people were referring to was the short-form
installation dialog that was demonstrated. I also think that Microsoft
should tailor it a bit and do what Apple does, which is to ask a short
question at the beginning of the install to determine if voice guidance
is wanted. That having been said, I know at least four
non-visually-impaired people who installed their copies of Windows using
the Cortana method and found it useful and helpful.
But of course you are absolutely correct about image deployment across
an enterprise. These issues would not, do not, crop up.
On 1/13/2019 6:26 PM, mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original
> podcast is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large
> number of negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired
> in windows. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below
> podcast does an excellent job in highlighting the errors.
>
>
>
> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurrott-is
> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--===============3286891523590050378==--
From jheim@math.wisc.edu Mon Jan 14 16:36:16 2019
From: John G Heim
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:36:06 -0600
Message-ID: <82c1f8b4-e861-250b-7565-be15403757e9@math.wisc.edu>
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB6PR0801MB18804E8308EBA4763E688D59AF800=40DB6PR08?=
=?utf-8?q?01MB1880=2Eeurprd08=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7832920885413672118=="
--===============7832920885413672118==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.=20
While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them,=20
accessibility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more=20
blind sys admins than most people realize. But having to call someone=20
over to help you install Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a=20
trivial thing. it is a matter of whether you can actually perform the=20
job you were hired to do or not. There aren't that many tweeks Microsoft=20
can make to Windows that can change the careers, and therefore the very=20
lives, of a whole class of people.
Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't=20
make it harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A=20
typical bug doesn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the=20
job market.
On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me a=
couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>=20
> Andrew.
> ________________________________________
> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> Thanks for highlighting this.
>=20
> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was ver=
y wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wedn=
esday.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> All,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podca=
st is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of=
negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows=
. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an e=
xcellent job in highlighting the errors.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurrott-is
> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
>=20
--===============7832920885413672118==--
From barry@tonermail.co.uk Mon Jan 14 17:09:54 2019
From: Barry Toner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:09:44 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <82c1f8b4-e861-250b-7565-be15403757e9@math.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3067760686647826390=="
--===============3067760686647826390==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]=20
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.=20
While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them,=20
accessibility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more=20
blind sys admins than most people realize. But having to call someone=20
over to help you install Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a=20
trivial thing. it is a matter of whether you can actually perform the=20
job you were hired to do or not. There aren't that many tweeks Microsoft=20
can make to Windows that can change the careers, and therefore the very=20
lives, of a whole class of people.
Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't=20
make it harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A=20
typical bug doesn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the=20
job market.
On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me a=
couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>=20
> Andrew.
> ________________________________________
> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> Thanks for highlighting this.
>=20
> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was ver=
y wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wedn=
esday.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> All,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podca=
st is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of=
negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows=
. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an e=
xcellent job in highlighting the errors.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurrott-is
> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
>=20
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============3067760686647826390==--
From billy.irwin@outlook.com Mon Jan 14 17:12:03 2019
From: Billy Irwin
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:11:51 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CAM6PR02MB470558B33CC7B721BFBD179BF9800=40AM6PR02MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4705=2Eeurprd02=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6519487145716644344=="
--===============6519487145716644344==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo directl=
y.
Best
Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner =20
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Hi,
I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.=20
While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them, accessib=
ility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more blind sys admins =
than most people realize. But having to call someone over to help you install=
Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial thing. it is a matter=
of whether you can actually perform the job you were hired to do or not. The=
re aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows that can change the=
careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole class of people.
Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't make it =
harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical bug doe=
sn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job market.
On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me a=
couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>=20
> Andrew.
> ________________________________________
> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> Thanks for highlighting this.
>=20
> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was ver=
y wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wedn=
esday.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> All,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podca=
st is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of=
negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows=
. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an e=
xcellent job in highlighting the errors.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
> ott-is
> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>=20
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============6519487145716644344==--
From barry@tonermail.co.uk Mon Jan 14 20:32:22 2019
From: Barry Toner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:32:13 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CBL0PR10MB2929ABBB9D0FF24ED7338EBDEB800=40BL0PR10MB?=
=?utf-8?q?2929=2Enamprd10=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5204419926895845782=="
--===============5204419926895845782==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind Associatio=
n discussion list. It is important that word is gotten out there, and that p=
eople contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our voice is heard. This=
is an utter disgrace. I've just about calmed down, after a few hours and a=
fair number of cigarettes.
Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing this. As =
I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect chang=
e the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this. It's important that we contac=
t them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG and accompanyi=
ng comments.
Barry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]=20
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo directl=
y.
Best
Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner =20
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Hi,
I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.=20
While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them, accessib=
ility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more blind sys admins =
than most people realize. But having to call someone over to help you install=
Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial thing. it is a matter=
of whether you can actually perform the job you were hired to do or not. The=
re aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows that can change the=
careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole class of people.
Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't make it =
harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical bug doe=
sn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job market.
On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me a=
couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>=20
> Andrew.
> ________________________________________
> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> Thanks for highlighting this.
>=20
> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was ver=
y wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wedn=
esday.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> All,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podca=
st is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of=
negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows=
. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an e=
xcellent job in highlighting the errors.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
> ott-is
> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>=20
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============5204419926895845782==--
From andrew@hodgson.io Mon Jan 14 20:57:24 2019
From: Andrew Hodgson
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:57:15 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CAM6PR02MB47053A6A4EF49A55DE696001F9800=40AM6PR02MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4705=2Eeurprd02=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6589344910781199683=="
--===============6589344910781199683==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Sorry only just got around to this now - I don't really listen to many podcas=
ts so had to make a bit of time.
I originally thought this was the Windows 10 RE mode speech we were talking a=
bout but we were talking about the OOBE. I am not sure what the end decision=
is on the talking OOBE now, but I agree that the way they implemented it was=
probably a bit dumb in the sense that everyone else I know of hates the thin=
g and wants to get rid of it. Also if you try and use it without enabling Na=
rrator you will have a tough time, so I think it needs addressing. However t=
he podcast was totally wrong and the comments made were at best misguided and=
at worse will only serve to clarify people's misguided opinion on what peopl=
e with little or no sight can do on a computer.
I am not sure what the state of the talking OOBE will be going forward, but I=
like the way Apple do this after a while of silence, and then only giving th=
e minimum of noise.
If I can find it the BCAB (presenter me!) did a presentation on installing Wi=
ndows from a completely blank disk and everyone was extremely pleased with th=
e work that MS did. However I did do a survey afterwards about how many peop=
le would try this on their own and in a room of 40 people only 2 said they wo=
uld try it actively which although I wasn't surprised, it did make me feel a =
bit sad.
Andrew.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner =20
Sent: 14 January 2019 20:32
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Hi,
I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind Associatio=
n discussion list. It is important that word is gotten out there, and that p=
eople contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our voice is heard. This=
is an utter disgrace. I've just about calmed down, after a few hours and a=
fair number of cigarettes.
Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing this. As =
I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect chang=
e the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this. It's important that we contac=
t them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG and accompanyi=
ng comments.
Barry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]=20
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo directl=
y.
Best
Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner =20
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Hi,
I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.=20
While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them, accessib=
ility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more blind sys admins =
than most people realize. But having to call someone over to help you install=
Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial thing. it is a matter=
of whether you can actually perform the job you were hired to do or not. The=
re aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows that can change the=
careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole class of people.
Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't make it =
harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical bug doe=
sn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job market.
On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me a=
couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>=20
> Andrew.
> ________________________________________
> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> Thanks for highlighting this.
>=20
> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was ver=
y wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wedn=
esday.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> All,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podca=
st is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of=
negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows=
. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an e=
xcellent job in highlighting the errors.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
> ott-is
> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>=20
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============6589344910781199683==--
From barry@tonermail.co.uk Tue Jan 15 07:02:11 2019
From: Barry Toner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:01:21 +0000
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8620850851984701199=="
--===============8620850851984701199==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of 192.168.1.1. =
I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the Powerl=
ine adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at the Power=
line adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I disconnect t=
he Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the router as expected. =
All network services are working as normal with or without the Powerline ada=
ptor. What is happening and when the Powerline adaptor is connecting and app=
arently stealing the gateway address where is the routers gateway or rather h=
ow is it being addressed?
At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but that =
doesn=E2=80=99t make sense as I haven=E2=80=99t configured the Powerline adap=
tors WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly fro=
m the router and not the Powerline adaptor=E2=80=A6. =20
Hope this makes sense?
Cheers,
Barry.
--===============8620850851984701199==--
From barry@tonermail.co.uk Tue Jan 15 07:56:09 2019
From: Barry Toner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:55:52 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3925925854373438817=="
--===============3925925854373438817==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the router is=
no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline adaptor=
....
Thanks for any help.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
Hi all,
I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of 192.168.1.1. =
I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the Powerl=
ine adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at the Power=
line adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I disconnect t=
he Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the router as expected. =
All network services are working as normal with or without the Powerline ada=
ptor. What is happening and when the Powerline adaptor is connecting and app=
arently stealing the gateway address where is the routers gateway or rather h=
ow is it being addressed?
At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but that =
doesn=E2=80=99t make sense as I haven=E2=80=99t configured the Powerline adap=
tors WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly fro=
m the router and not the Powerline adaptor=E2=80=A6. =20
Hope this makes sense?
Cheers,
Barry.
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============3925925854373438817==--
From barry@tonermail.co.uk Tue Jan 15 08:41:34 2019
From: Barry Toner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:41:19 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CAM6PR02MB470520CC2069F2D76CF6C785F9810=40AM6PR02MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4705=2Eeurprd02=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5820287554050451499=="
--===============5820287554050451499==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I don't mean to spam the list but I'm adding details as I discover them.
So, I've just logged onto the Windows 10 pc that I have connected to my power=
line adaptor. Performing an ipconfig/all I can see the gateway is 192.168.0.=
1. From any client connecting to my SSID and attempting to browse to 192.168=
.1.1 they end up on the TPLink powerline adaptor web admin, and not the Asus =
router that the SSID is being broadcast from.
Using the Windows client if I pop the gateway 192.168.0.1 in I get a Sky HUB!=
I don't have Sky!
I am in an apartment. Is it possible that my apartment and the other apartme=
nt are sharing wiring and that's what's happening? If so, weird and how can =
I get off this network and just onto my own? Also, I was using this powerlin=
e adaptor two days aago and I could access my network!
Thanks all,
Barry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Hi,
To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the router is=
no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline adaptor=
....
Thanks for any help.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
Hi all,
I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of 192.168.1.1. =
I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the Powerl=
ine adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at the Power=
line adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I disconnect t=
he Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the router as expected. =
All network services are working as normal with or without the Powerline ada=
ptor. What is happening and when the Powerline adaptor is connecting and app=
arently stealing the gateway address where is the routers gateway or rather h=
ow is it being addressed?
At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but that =
doesn=E2=80=99t make sense as I haven=E2=80=99t configured the Powerline adap=
tors WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly fro=
m the router and not the Powerline adaptor=E2=80=A6. =20
Hope this makes sense?
Cheers,
Barry.
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============5820287554050451499==--
From barry@tonermail.co.uk Tue Jan 15 08:43:47 2019
From: Barry Toner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:43:38 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CAM6PR02MB4705E935645C8296EFE1E5E4F9810=40AM6PR02MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4705=2Eeurprd02=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3201506309118393156=="
--===============3201506309118393156==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Yes this is creepy. I can see the client list on whoevers SkyHubthis is. Th=
ere's my Windows client, plus 8 other clients, all with the peoples names...
Barry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:41 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Hi,
I don't mean to spam the list but I'm adding details as I discover them.
So, I've just logged onto the Windows 10 pc that I have connected to my power=
line adaptor. Performing an ipconfig/all I can see the gateway is 192.168.0.=
1. From any client connecting to my SSID and attempting to browse to 192.168=
.1.1 they end up on the TPLink powerline adaptor web admin, and not the Asus =
router that the SSID is being broadcast from.
Using the Windows client if I pop the gateway 192.168.0.1 in I get a Sky HUB!=
I don't have Sky!
I am in an apartment. Is it possible that my apartment and the other apartme=
nt are sharing wiring and that's what's happening? If so, weird and how can =
I get off this network and just onto my own? Also, I was using this powerlin=
e adaptor two days aago and I could access my network!
Thanks all,
Barry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Hi,
To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the router is=
no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline adaptor=
....
Thanks for any help.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
Hi all,
I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of 192.168.1.1. =
I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the Powerl=
ine adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at the Power=
line adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I disconnect t=
he Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the router as expected. =
All network services are working as normal with or without the Powerline ada=
ptor. What is happening and when the Powerline adaptor is connecting and app=
arently stealing the gateway address where is the routers gateway or rather h=
ow is it being addressed?
At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but that =
doesn=E2=80=99t make sense as I haven=E2=80=99t configured the Powerline adap=
tors WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly fro=
m the router and not the Powerline adaptor=E2=80=A6. =20
Hope this makes sense?
Cheers,
Barry.
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============3201506309118393156==--
From codeofdusk@gmail.com Tue Jan 15 09:43:40 2019
From: Bill Dengler
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:43:17 -0500
Message-ID: <36199118-FBD3-4462-BB89-820CD0F7153A@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CAM6PR02MB47051F14FE0ED2DC46FD09F8F9810=40AM6PR02MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4705=2Eeurprd02=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3889935222964522824=="
--===============3889935222964522824==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Are you sure your Asus router is in router mode (not WAP, look under administ=
ration)? Do the clients disappear when you turn off the wireless radios (wire=
less/professional, both/all bands)?
Bill
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 03:43, Barry Toner wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> Yes this is creepy. I can see the client list on whoevers SkyHubthis is. =
There's my Windows client, plus 8 other clients, all with the peoples names...
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Barry.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:41 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> I don't mean to spam the list but I'm adding details as I discover them.
>=20
> So, I've just logged onto the Windows 10 pc that I have connected to my pow=
erline adaptor. Performing an ipconfig/all I can see the gateway is 192.168.=
0.1. From any client connecting to my SSID and attempting to browse to 192.1=
68.1.1 they end up on the TPLink powerline adaptor web admin, and not the Asu=
s router that the SSID is being broadcast from.
> Using the Windows client if I pop the gateway 192.168.0.1 in I get a Sky HU=
B! I don't have Sky!
> I am in an apartment. Is it possible that my apartment and the other apart=
ment are sharing wiring and that's what's happening? If so, weird and how ca=
n I get off this network and just onto my own? Also, I was using this powerl=
ine adaptor two days aago and I could access my network!
>=20
> Thanks all,
> Barry.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the router =
is no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline adapt=
or....
>=20
> Thanks for any help.
>=20
> Barry
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi all,
>=20
> I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of 192.168.1.1.=
I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
> When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the Powe=
rline adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at the Pow=
erline adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I disconnect=
the Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the router as expected=
. All network services are working as normal with or without the Powerline a=
daptor. What is happening and when the Powerline adaptor is connecting and a=
pparently stealing the gateway address where is the routers gateway or rather=
how is it being addressed?
>=20
> At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but tha=
t doesn=E2=80=99t make sense as I haven=E2=80=99t configured the Powerline ad=
aptors WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly f=
rom the router and not the Powerline adaptor=E2=80=A6. =20
>=20
> Hope this makes sense?
>=20
> Cheers,
> Barry.
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
--===============3889935222964522824==--
From barry@tonermail.co.uk Tue Jan 15 10:05:17 2019
From: Barry Toner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:04:54 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <36199118-FBD3-4462-BB89-820CD0F7153A@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2141623384149518403=="
--===============2141623384149518403==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
It appears my powerline adaptor has picked up my neighbors network. Probably=
due to the properties being connected. A bit of googling has told me that I=
should be able to get back onto my own network by encrypting/securing my pow=
erline adaptors.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dengler [mailto:codeofdusk(a)gmail.com]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 9:43 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Are you sure your Asus router is in router mode (not WAP, look under administ=
ration)? Do the clients disappear when you turn off the wireless radios (wire=
less/professional, both/all bands)?
Bill
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 03:43, Barry Toner wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> Yes this is creepy. I can see the client list on whoevers SkyHubthis is. =
There's my Windows client, plus 8 other clients, all with the peoples names...
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Barry.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:41 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> I don't mean to spam the list but I'm adding details as I discover them.
>=20
> So, I've just logged onto the Windows 10 pc that I have connected to my pow=
erline adaptor. Performing an ipconfig/all I can see the gateway is 192.168.=
0.1. From any client connecting to my SSID and attempting to browse to 192.1=
68.1.1 they end up on the TPLink powerline adaptor web admin, and not the Asu=
s router that the SSID is being broadcast from.
> Using the Windows client if I pop the gateway 192.168.0.1 in I get a Sky HU=
B! I don't have Sky!
> I am in an apartment. Is it possible that my apartment and the other apart=
ment are sharing wiring and that's what's happening? If so, weird and how ca=
n I get off this network and just onto my own? Also, I was using this powerl=
ine adaptor two days aago and I could access my network!
>=20
> Thanks all,
> Barry.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the router =
is no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline adapt=
or....
>=20
> Thanks for any help.
>=20
> Barry
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi all,
>=20
> I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of 192.168.1.1.=
I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
> When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the Powe=
rline adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at the Pow=
erline adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I disconnect=
the Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the router as expected=
. All network services are working as normal with or without the Powerline a=
daptor. What is happening and when the Powerline adaptor is connecting and a=
pparently stealing the gateway address where is the routers gateway or rather=
how is it being addressed?
>=20
> At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but tha=
t doesn=E2=80=99t make sense as I haven=E2=80=99t configured the Powerline ad=
aptors WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly f=
rom the router and not the Powerline adaptor=E2=80=A6. =20
>=20
> Hope this makes sense?
>=20
> Cheers,
> Barry.
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============2141623384149518403==--
From d@digitaldarragh.com Tue Jan 15 10:05:22 2019
From: Darragh =?utf-8?q?=C3=93_H=C3=A9iligh?=
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:05:11 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB6PR0801MB1880A351AE6772E120B043E2AF800=40DB6PR08?=
=?utf-8?q?01MB1880=2Eeurprd08=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8555442928681410288=="
--===============8555442928681410288==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks everyone. From Wednesday morning I would ask that everyone tweets @Thu=
rrott with the following:=20
#AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte=20
You could write a message like this:=20
Because Microsoft invested in accessibility, I can use SCCM to administer tho=
usands of workstations. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #L=
eoLaporte=20
Narrator in Windows 10 is becoming a very powerful screen reader. #Accessibil=
ityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte=20
Because Microsoft works with companies like Freedom Scientific and NVAccess, =
Windows 10 is very accessible. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWe=
ekly #LeoLaporte=20
I administer 104,000 users in active directory. It's fully accessible. #Acces=
sibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte=20
I'm a full stack developer thanks to Visual studio. #AccessibilityWins @Thurr=
ott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte=20
Windows Weekly airs again tomorrow, Wednesday. I really want the messages re=
lating to accessibility to be clear in Paul's, Mary's and Leo's mind while th=
ey sit down to present tomorrow's show.=20
Feel free to ask people to retweet.=20
I agree that The OOB experience could be better.=20
And I know I don't need to say it but just for the benefit of others, the poi=
nts I was making weren't related to the OOB. Certain people who disagree wit=
h me are trying to conflate my points to associate them with frustrations aro=
und OOB but my issues are with how Paul attacked accessibility. Not the way h=
e attacked the OOB. =20
I'm just saying this again here. Not because I think people are misunderstand=
ing me but because I have been misunderstood, sometimes intentionally on some=
other forums.=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Hodgson =20
Sent: Monday 14 January 2019 20:57
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Hi,
Sorry only just got around to this now - I don't really listen to many podcas=
ts so had to make a bit of time.
I originally thought this was the Windows 10 RE mode speech we were talking a=
bout but we were talking about the OOBE. I am not sure what the end decision=
is on the talking OOBE now, but I agree that the way they implemented it was=
probably a bit dumb in the sense that everyone else I know of hates the thin=
g and wants to get rid of it. Also if you try and use it without enabling Na=
rrator you will have a tough time, so I think it needs addressing. However t=
he podcast was totally wrong and the comments made were at best misguided and=
at worse will only serve to clarify people's misguided opinion on what peopl=
e with little or no sight can do on a computer.
I am not sure what the state of the talking OOBE will be going forward, but I=
like the way Apple do this after a while of silence, and then only giving th=
e minimum of noise.
If I can find it the BCAB (presenter me!) did a presentation on installing Wi=
ndows from a completely blank disk and everyone was extremely pleased with th=
e work that MS did. However I did do a survey afterwards about how many peop=
le would try this on their own and in a room of 40 people only 2 said they wo=
uld try it actively which although I wasn't surprised, it did make me feel a =
bit sad.
Andrew.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner =20
Sent: 14 January 2019 20:32
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Hi,
I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind Associatio=
n discussion list. It is important that word is gotten out there, and that p=
eople contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our voice is heard. This=
is an utter disgrace. I've just about calmed down, after a few hours and a=
fair number of cigarettes.
Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing this. As =
I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect chang=
e the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this. It's important that we contac=
t them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG and accompanyi=
ng comments.
Barry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]=20
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo directl=
y.
Best
Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner =20
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Hi,
I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.=20
While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them, accessib=
ility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more blind sys admins =
than most people realize. But having to call someone over to help you install=
Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial thing. it is a matter=
of whether you can actually perform the job you were hired to do or not. The=
re aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows that can change the=
careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole class of people.
Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't make it =
harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical bug doe=
sn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job market.
On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me a=
couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>=20
> Andrew.
> ________________________________________
> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> Thanks for highlighting this.
>=20
> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was ver=
y wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him on Wedn=
esday.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>=20
> All,
>=20
>=20
>=20
> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original podca=
st is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large number of=
negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired in windows=
. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below podcast does an e=
xcellent job in highlighting the errors.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
> ott-is
> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --=20
> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to=20
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>=20
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============8555442928681410288==--
From ultimatethesecond@googlemail.com Tue Jan 15 10:09:55 2019
From: Chris Turner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:57:43 +0000
Message-ID: <03a9d122-bbd0-a4b3-fe3e-77634018ce0f@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <00c201d4ab97$67431d10$35c95730$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8982307782618527229=="
--===============8982307782618527229==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'll download and listen but just reaction to the quote
No offence to people who cant see or who see poorly and who want to set=20
up Windows 10 on their own but if your vision is that bad the act of=20
setting up Windows 10 is not a priority. In the background, Leo laughs.=20
Paul continues: It=E2=80=99s something that is going happen once and you=20
probably have someone else that can help you with that.
Never mind that IT is a field a lot of tech savy VI people are drawn to=20
as there's a significant opportunity for self learning and=20
resourcefulness that comes with the teratry. Being able to install Win10=20
as a blind person has been a great improvement for me. This is such a=20
dum argument. Why improve anything for anyone when they've always been=20
able to do it the long way round, presumably. Yeah, we all have people=20
we can rely on to help, when they're available, maybe. I mean it's not=20
like your productivity counts or anything if you're blind.
Better listen to it for context now I spose.
:)
Regards
Chris Turner
On 13/01/19 23:26, mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com wrote:
> All,
>
> =20
>
> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original
> podcast is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large
> number of negative statements against accessibility for the vision impaired
> in windows. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the below
> podcast does an excellent job in highlighting the errors.
>
> =20
>
> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurrott-is
> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>
> =20
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
--===============8982307782618527229==--
From barry@tonermail.co.uk Tue Jan 15 10:32:14 2019
From: Barry Toner
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:31:57 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CAM6PR02MB470570586A998B8C55D15E61F9810=40AM6PR02MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4705=2Eeurprd02=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4092785985314503125=="
--===============4092785985314503125==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
For completeness. Securing/encrypting my powerline adaptor has now popped me=
back onto my own network.
I never knew this was possible. It's frightening just how insecure by defaul=
t powerline adaptors are and that I was able to see my neighbors router web a=
dmin, just by popping in powerline adaptors.
Of course it makes theoretical sense, given the buildings are joined that I w=
ould be sharing the same powerlines... If I was a malicious user I could hav=
e very easily reset their router, changed the WIFI password and locked them o=
ut, all be it until they called their ISP and reset the router but then I cou=
ld jump back on and essentially get free Internet....
FYI my powerline adaptor was just a basic TP Link 4220 KIT and the neighbors =
router was a Sky HUB. Plugging the adaptors in, and finding out the gateway =
I was connected to, then popping that into the browser and I was logged into =
their routers web admin without being challenged to authenticate...
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 10:05 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Hi,
It appears my powerline adaptor has picked up my neighbors network. Probably=
due to the properties being connected. A bit of googling has told me that I=
should be able to get back onto my own network by encrypting/securing my pow=
erline adaptors.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dengler [mailto:codeofdusk(a)gmail.com]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 9:43 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Are you sure your Asus router is in router mode (not WAP, look under administ=
ration)? Do the clients disappear when you turn off the wireless radios (wire=
less/professional, both/all bands)?
Bill
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 03:43, Barry Toner wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> Yes this is creepy. I can see the client list on whoevers SkyHubthis is. =
There's my Windows client, plus 8 other clients, all with the peoples names...
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Barry.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:41 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> I don't mean to spam the list but I'm adding details as I discover them.
>=20
> So, I've just logged onto the Windows 10 pc that I have connected to my pow=
erline adaptor. Performing an ipconfig/all I can see the gateway is 192.168.=
0.1. From any client connecting to my SSID and attempting to browse to 192.1=
68.1.1 they end up on the TPLink powerline adaptor web admin, and not the Asu=
s router that the SSID is being broadcast from.
> Using the Windows client if I pop the gateway 192.168.0.1 in I get a Sky HU=
B! I don't have Sky!
> I am in an apartment. Is it possible that my apartment and the other apart=
ment are sharing wiring and that's what's happening? If so, weird and how ca=
n I get off this network and just onto my own? Also, I was using this powerl=
ine adaptor two days aago and I could access my network!
>=20
> Thanks all,
> Barry.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the router =
is no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline adapt=
or....
>=20
> Thanks for any help.
>=20
> Barry
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
>=20
> Hi all,
>=20
> I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of 192.168.1.1.=
I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
> When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the Powe=
rline adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at the Pow=
erline adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I disconnect=
the Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the router as expected=
. All network services are working as normal with or without the Powerline a=
daptor. What is happening and when the Powerline adaptor is connecting and a=
pparently stealing the gateway address where is the routers gateway or rather=
how is it being addressed?
>=20
> At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but tha=
t doesn=E2=80=99t make sense as I haven=E2=80=99t configured the Powerline ad=
aptors WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly f=
rom the router and not the Powerline adaptor=E2=80=A6. =20
>=20
> Hope this makes sense?
>=20
> Cheers,
> Barry.
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============4092785985314503125==--
From andrew@hodgson.io Tue Jan 15 11:51:33 2019
From: Andrew Hodgson
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:50:52 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CAM6PR02MB47052C5A6EB7844C840E3EE1F9810=40AM6PR02MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4705=2Eeurprd02=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8161649589198154197=="
--===============8161649589198154197==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
There is a misconception that these powerlines need a direct electric hookup =
between the systems in order for them to connect. They use the electric wiri=
ng as aerials and so it is perfectly possible for them to see each other even=
though you are on a different ring.
I had a story about this a year or so back. I had taken a load of powerlines=
from my parents to try and sort out a network issue I had at my flat as it h=
as thick walls, they had a load from when I lived there and they weren't usin=
g them. I plugged them in and reset them to default, and as part of this pro=
cess I thought I was seeing my own network. I had existing powerlines which =
were encrypted. The software I was using prompted me that the powerlines nee=
ded a firmware upgrade so I went ahead with this. It took a fairly long time=
to complete which I was surprised about, and as part of the upgrade it said =
it was upgrading a wireless access point which I didn't have. The usability =
of the software wasn't good anyway, so I was fiddling around a bit. When the=
upgrades completed I attempted to get onto my router to identify DHCP leases=
and found I was presented with a BT hub instead. Yes I had connected to a n=
eighbour with similar powerlines and upgraded all their kit!
Andrew.
________________________________________
From: Barry Toner [barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
Sent: 15 January 2019 10:31
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Hi,
For completeness. Securing/encrypting my powerline adaptor has now popped me=
back onto my own network.
I never knew this was possible. It's frightening just how insecure by defaul=
t powerline adaptors are and that I was able to see my neighbors router web a=
dmin, just by popping in powerline adaptors.
Of course it makes theoretical sense, given the buildings are joined that I w=
ould be sharing the same powerlines... If I was a malicious user I could hav=
e very easily reset their router, changed the WIFI password and locked them o=
ut, all be it until they called their ISP and reset the router but then I cou=
ld jump back on and essentially get free Internet....
FYI my powerline adaptor was just a basic TP Link 4220 KIT and the neighbors =
router was a Sky HUB. Plugging the adaptors in, and finding out the gateway =
I was connected to, then popping that into the browser and I was logged into =
their routers web admin without being challenged to authenticate...
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 10:05 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Hi,
It appears my powerline adaptor has picked up my neighbors network. Probably=
due to the properties being connected. A bit of googling has told me that I=
should be able to get back onto my own network by encrypting/securing my pow=
erline adaptors.
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Dengler [mailto:codeofdusk(a)gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 9:43 AM
To: Blind sysadmins list
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Are you sure your Asus router is in router mode (not WAP, look under administ=
ration)? Do the clients disappear when you turn off the wireless radios (wire=
less/professional, both/all bands)?
Bill
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 03:43, Barry Toner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes this is creepy. I can see the client list on whoevers SkyHubthis is. =
There's my Windows client, plus 8 other clients, all with the peoples names...
>
>
>
> Barry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:41 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't mean to spam the list but I'm adding details as I discover them.
>
> So, I've just logged onto the Windows 10 pc that I have connected to my pow=
erline adaptor. Performing an ipconfig/all I can see the gateway is 192.168.=
0.1. From any client connecting to my SSID and attempting to browse to 192.1=
68.1.1 they end up on the TPLink powerline adaptor web admin, and not the Asu=
s router that the SSID is being broadcast from.
> Using the Windows client if I pop the gateway 192.168.0.1 in I get a Sky HU=
B! I don't have Sky!
> I am in an apartment. Is it possible that my apartment and the other apart=
ment are sharing wiring and that's what's happening? If so, weird and how ca=
n I get off this network and just onto my own? Also, I was using this powerl=
ine adaptor two days aago and I could access my network!
>
> Thanks all,
> Barry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>
> Hi,
>
> To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the router =
is no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline adapt=
or....
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Barry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of 192.168.1.1.=
I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
> When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the Powe=
rline adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at the Pow=
erline adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I disconnect=
the Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the router as expected=
. All network services are working as normal with or without the Powerline a=
daptor. What is happening and when the Powerline adaptor is connecting and a=
pparently stealing the gateway address where is the routers gateway or rather=
how is it being addressed?
>
> At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but tha=
t doesn=E2=80=99t make sense as I haven=E2=80=99t configured the Powerline ad=
aptors WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly f=
rom the router and not the Powerline adaptor=E2=80=A6.
>
> Hope this makes sense?
>
> Cheers,
> Barry.
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
_______________________________________________
Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.o=
rg
--===============8161649589198154197==--
From ben@benmr.com Tue Jan 15 12:36:07 2019
From: Ben Mustill-Rose
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:35:33 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB6PR0801MB188097A5DB485F5489C0620FAF810=40DB6PR08?=
=?utf-8?q?01MB1880=2Eeurprd08=2Eprod=2Eoutlook=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6776443153524677811=="
--===============6776443153524677811==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Haha that's taking the whole friendly neighbourhood IT guy type thing
a little bit too far do you not think Andrew? You should have invoiced
them for the work you carried out. At least they would have known that
said work had taken place that way.
On 1/15/19, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a misconception that these powerlines need a direct electric hookup
> between the systems in order for them to connect. They use the electric
> wiring as aerials and so it is perfectly possible for them to see each other
> even though you are on a different ring.
>
> I had a story about this a year or so back. I had taken a load of
> powerlines from my parents to try and sort out a network issue I had at my
> flat as it has thick walls, they had a load from when I lived there and they
> weren't using them. I plugged them in and reset them to default, and as
> part of this process I thought I was seeing my own network. I had existing
> powerlines which were encrypted. The software I was using prompted me that
> the powerlines needed a firmware upgrade so I went ahead with this. It took
> a fairly long time to complete which I was surprised about, and as part of
> the upgrade it said it was upgrading a wireless access point which I didn't
> have. The usability of the software wasn't good anyway, so I was fiddling
> around a bit. When the upgrades completed I attempted to get onto my router
> to identify DHCP leases and found I was presented with a BT hub instead.
> Yes I had connected to a neighbour with similar powerlines and upgraded all
> their kit!
>
> Andrew.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Barry Toner [barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
> Sent: 15 January 2019 10:31
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>
> Hi,
>
> For completeness. Securing/encrypting my powerline adaptor has now popped
> me back onto my own network.
>
> I never knew this was possible. It's frightening just how insecure by
> default powerline adaptors are and that I was able to see my neighbors
> router web admin, just by popping in powerline adaptors.
> Of course it makes theoretical sense, given the buildings are joined that I
> would be sharing the same powerlines... If I was a malicious user I could
> have very easily reset their router, changed the WIFI password and locked
> them out, all be it until they called their ISP and reset the router but
> then I could jump back on and essentially get free Internet....
> FYI my powerline adaptor was just a basic TP Link 4220 KIT and the neighbors
> router was a Sky HUB. Plugging the adaptors in, and finding out the gateway
> I was connected to, then popping that into the browser and I was logged into
> their routers web admin without being challenged to authenticate...
>
>
> Barry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 10:05 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>
> Hi,
>
> It appears my powerline adaptor has picked up my neighbors network.
> Probably due to the properties being connected. A bit of googling has told
> me that I should be able to get back onto my own network by
> encrypting/securing my powerline adaptors.
>
> Barry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Dengler [mailto:codeofdusk(a)gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 9:43 AM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>
> Are you sure your Asus router is in router mode (not WAP, look under
> administration)? Do the clients disappear when you turn off the wireless
> radios (wireless/professional, both/all bands)?
>
> Bill
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 03:43, Barry Toner wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes this is creepy. I can see the client list on whoevers SkyHubthis is.
>> There's my Windows client, plus 8 other clients, all with the peoples
>> names...
>>
>>
>>
>> Barry.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:41 AM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't mean to spam the list but I'm adding details as I discover them.
>>
>> So, I've just logged onto the Windows 10 pc that I have connected to my
>> powerline adaptor. Performing an ipconfig/all I can see the gateway is
>> 192.168.0.1. From any client connecting to my SSID and attempting to
>> browse to 192.168.1.1 they end up on the TPLink powerline adaptor web
>> admin, and not the Asus router that the SSID is being broadcast from.
>> Using the Windows client if I pop the gateway 192.168.0.1 in I get a Sky
>> HUB! I don't have Sky!
>> I am in an apartment. Is it possible that my apartment and the other
>> apartment are sharing wiring and that's what's happening? If so, weird
>> and how can I get off this network and just onto my own? Also, I was
>> using this powerline adaptor two days aago and I could access my network!
>>
>> Thanks all,
>> Barry.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the router
>> is no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline
>> adaptor....
>>
>> Thanks for any help.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of
>> 192.168.1.1. I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
>> When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the
>> Powerline adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up at
>> the Powerline adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if I
>> disconnect the Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the
>> router as expected. All network services are working as normal with or
>> without the Powerline adaptor. What is happening and when the Powerline
>> adaptor is connecting and apparently stealing the gateway address where is
>> the routers gateway or rather how is it being addressed?
>>
>> At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but
>> that doesn’t make sense as I haven’t configured the Powerline adaptors
>> WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly from
>> the router and not the Powerline adaptor….
>>
>> Hope this makes sense?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Barry.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>
--===============6776443153524677811==--
From ben@benmr.com Tue Jan 15 12:52:06 2019
From: Ben Mustill-Rose
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:51:26 +0000
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5167792018639901577=="
--===============5167792018639901577==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi again
Just to add something semi-constructive, it's important to do local
speed testing when using Powerline adaptors, partly because some
companies appear to be faking the connection speed (I previously used
Sumvision adaptors that showed as connecting at 1Gbps but actually
only supported Homeplug 1.0 at 85Mbps) and partly because throughput
decreases depending on range, how the adaptors are connected, other
devices that are plugged in and if both adaptors are on the same
circuit. I've had good results with the Windows port of Iperf3 to do
this recently & the process of optimizing everything to get the best
speeds possible was actually quite fun although largely redundant as
the internet connection of the network in question was only DSL.
Cheers,
Ben.
On 1/15/19, Ben Mustill-Rose wrote:
> Haha that's taking the whole friendly neighbourhood IT guy type thing
> a little bit too far do you not think Andrew? You should have invoiced
> them for the work you carried out. At least they would have known that
> said work had taken place that way.
>
> On 1/15/19, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is a misconception that these powerlines need a direct electric
>> hookup
>> between the systems in order for them to connect. They use the electric
>> wiring as aerials and so it is perfectly possible for them to see each
>> other
>> even though you are on a different ring.
>>
>> I had a story about this a year or so back. I had taken a load of
>> powerlines from my parents to try and sort out a network issue I had at
>> my
>> flat as it has thick walls, they had a load from when I lived there and
>> they
>> weren't using them. I plugged them in and reset them to default, and as
>> part of this process I thought I was seeing my own network. I had
>> existing
>> powerlines which were encrypted. The software I was using prompted me
>> that
>> the powerlines needed a firmware upgrade so I went ahead with this. It
>> took
>> a fairly long time to complete which I was surprised about, and as part
>> of
>> the upgrade it said it was upgrading a wireless access point which I
>> didn't
>> have. The usability of the software wasn't good anyway, so I was
>> fiddling
>> around a bit. When the upgrades completed I attempted to get onto my
>> router
>> to identify DHCP leases and found I was presented with a BT hub instead.
>> Yes I had connected to a neighbour with similar powerlines and upgraded
>> all
>> their kit!
>>
>> Andrew.
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Barry Toner [barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
>> Sent: 15 January 2019 10:31
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For completeness. Securing/encrypting my powerline adaptor has now
>> popped
>> me back onto my own network.
>>
>> I never knew this was possible. It's frightening just how insecure by
>> default powerline adaptors are and that I was able to see my neighbors
>> router web admin, just by popping in powerline adaptors.
>> Of course it makes theoretical sense, given the buildings are joined that
>> I
>> would be sharing the same powerlines... If I was a malicious user I
>> could
>> have very easily reset their router, changed the WIFI password and locked
>> them out, all be it until they called their ISP and reset the router but
>> then I could jump back on and essentially get free Internet....
>> FYI my powerline adaptor was just a basic TP Link 4220 KIT and the
>> neighbors
>> router was a Sky HUB. Plugging the adaptors in, and finding out the
>> gateway
>> I was connected to, then popping that into the browser and I was logged
>> into
>> their routers web admin without being challenged to authenticate...
>>
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 10:05 AM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It appears my powerline adaptor has picked up my neighbors network.
>> Probably due to the properties being connected. A bit of googling has
>> told
>> me that I should be able to get back onto my own network by
>> encrypting/securing my powerline adaptors.
>>
>> Barry
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bill Dengler [mailto:codeofdusk(a)gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 9:43 AM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>>
>> Are you sure your Asus router is in router mode (not WAP, look under
>> administration)? Do the clients disappear when you turn off the wireless
>> radios (wireless/professional, both/all bands)?
>>
>> Bill
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 03:43, Barry Toner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Yes this is creepy. I can see the client list on whoevers SkyHubthis
>>> is.
>>> There's my Windows client, plus 8 other clients, all with the peoples
>>> names...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Barry.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 8:41 AM
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't mean to spam the list but I'm adding details as I discover them.
>>>
>>> So, I've just logged onto the Windows 10 pc that I have connected to my
>>> powerline adaptor. Performing an ipconfig/all I can see the gateway is
>>> 192.168.0.1. From any client connecting to my SSID and attempting to
>>> browse to 192.168.1.1 they end up on the TPLink powerline adaptor web
>>> admin, and not the Asus router that the SSID is being broadcast from.
>>> Using the Windows client if I pop the gateway 192.168.0.1 in I get a Sky
>>> HUB! I don't have Sky!
>>> I am in an apartment. Is it possible that my apartment and the other
>>> apartment are sharing wiring and that's what's happening? If so, weird
>>> and how can I get off this network and just onto my own? Also, I was
>>> using this powerline adaptor two days aago and I could access my
>>> network!
>>>
>>> Thanks all,
>>> Barry.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:56 AM
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Strange gateway issue
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> To add to this. I notice that a hard drive I have connected to the
>>> router
>>> is no longer accessible on a Windows PC connected through the powerline
>>> adaptor....
>>>
>>> Thanks for any help.
>>>
>>> Barry
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Barry Toner [mailto:barry(a)tonermail.co.uk]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 7:01 AM
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Strange gateway issue
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have an Asus router that has the standard gateway address of
>>> 192.168.1.1. I connected a Powerline adaptor from TP Link.
>>> When I connect to the SSID being broadcast from the router and not the
>>> Powerline adaptor, and try to browse to the routers web admin I end up
>>> at
>>> the Powerline adaptor web admin using the gateway address. However, if
>>> I
>>> disconnect the Powerline adaptor the gateway address takes me to the
>>> router as expected. All network services are working as normal with or
>>> without the Powerline adaptor. What is happening and when the Powerline
>>> adaptor is connecting and apparently stealing the gateway address where
>>> is
>>> the routers gateway or rather how is it being addressed?
>>>
>>> At first I thought the Powerline adaptor was taking over as a DHCP, but
>>> that doesn’t make sense as I haven’t configured the Powerline adaptors
>>> WIFI move, so as far as I am aware the SSID is still coming directly
>>> from
>>> the router and not the Powerline adaptor….
>>>
>>> Hope this makes sense?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Barry.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>
>
--===============5167792018639901577==--
From stofflet@gmail.com Wed Jan 16 15:13:48 2019
From: Jared Stofflett
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:13:33 -0500
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3CDB7PR01MB42991E9700A7D6A86CA835EEC0810=40DB7PR01MB?=
=?utf-8?q?4299=2Eeurprd01=2Eprod=2Eexchangelabs=2Ecom=3E?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6120701664302781921=="
--===============6120701664302781921==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I have no problem with what was said on that podcast. As someone who's
blind and just set up a new Windows laptop I find cortana's "a little
wifi" spiel insulting. I would expect Narrator to start talking after
some period of time, or if I don't want to wait just enable it with
control+alt+win like normal.
On 1/15/19, Darragh Ó Héiligh wrote:
> Thanks everyone. From Wednesday morning I would ask that everyone tweets
> @Thurrott with the following:
>
> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>
> You could write a message like this:
>
> Because Microsoft invested in accessibility, I can use SCCM to administer
> thousands of workstations. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>
> Narrator in Windows 10 is becoming a very powerful screen reader.
> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>
> Because Microsoft works with companies like Freedom Scientific and NVAccess,
> Windows 10 is very accessible. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>
> I administer 104,000 users in active directory. It's fully accessible.
> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>
> I'm a full stack developer thanks to Visual studio. #AccessibilityWins
> @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>
> Windows Weekly airs again tomorrow, Wednesday. I really want the messages
> relating to accessibility to be clear in Paul's, Mary's and Leo's mind while
> they sit down to present tomorrow's show.
>
> Feel free to ask people to retweet.
>
>
> I agree that The OOB experience could be better.
> And I know I don't need to say it but just for the benefit of others, the
> points I was making weren't related to the OOB. Certain people who disagree
> with me are trying to conflate my points to associate them with frustrations
> around OOB but my issues are with how Paul attacked accessibility. Not the
> way he attacked the OOB.
>
> I'm just saying this again here. Not because I think people are
> misunderstanding me but because I have been misunderstood, sometimes
> intentionally on some other forums.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Hodgson
> Sent: Monday 14 January 2019 20:57
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry only just got around to this now - I don't really listen to many
> podcasts so had to make a bit of time.
>
> I originally thought this was the Windows 10 RE mode speech we were talking
> about but we were talking about the OOBE. I am not sure what the end
> decision is on the talking OOBE now, but I agree that the way they
> implemented it was probably a bit dumb in the sense that everyone else I
> know of hates the thing and wants to get rid of it. Also if you try and use
> it without enabling Narrator you will have a tough time, so I think it needs
> addressing. However the podcast was totally wrong and the comments made
> were at best misguided and at worse will only serve to clarify people's
> misguided opinion on what people with little or no sight can do on a
> computer.
>
> I am not sure what the state of the talking OOBE will be going forward, but
> I like the way Apple do this after a while of silence, and then only giving
> the minimum of noise.
>
> If I can find it the BCAB (presenter me!) did a presentation on installing
> Windows from a completely blank disk and everyone was extremely pleased with
> the work that MS did. However I did do a survey afterwards about how many
> people would try this on their own and in a room of 40 people only 2 said
> they would try it actively which although I wasn't surprised, it did make me
> feel a bit sad.
>
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner
> Sent: 14 January 2019 20:32
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>
> Hi,
>
> I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind
> Association discussion list. It is important that word is gotten out there,
> and that people contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our voice is
> heard. This is an utter disgrace. I've just about calmed down, after a
> few hours and a fair number of cigarettes.
>
> Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing this. As
> I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect
> change the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this. It's important that we
> contact them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG and
> accompanying comments.
>
> Barry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
> To: Blind sysadmins list
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>
> I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo
> directly.
>
> Best
>
> Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Toner
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
> To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
>
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>
> Hi,
>
> I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
>
> Barry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
> To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>
> I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.
> While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them,
> accessibility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more blind
> sys admins than most people realize. But having to call someone over to help
> you install Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial thing. it
> is a matter of whether you can actually perform the job you were hired to do
> or not. There aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows that
> can change the careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole class of
> people.
>
>
> Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't make it
> harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical bug
> doesn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job market.
>
>
> On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me
>> a couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>>
>> Andrew.
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Darragh Ó Héiligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
>> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> Thanks for highlighting this.
>>
>> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was
>> very wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him
>> on Wednesday.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
>> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
>> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original
>> podcast is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large
>> number of negative statements against accessibility for the vision
>> impaired in windows. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the
>> below podcast does an excellent job in highlighting the errors.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
>> ott-is
>> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>
--===============6120701664302781921==--
From simon.eigeldinger@vol.at Wed Jan 16 16:16:00 2019
From: Simon Eigeldinger
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:15:33 +0100
Message-ID: <16511500-260d-f56f-07f3-b1b38fb72298@vol.at>
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7895256787172786459=="
--===============7895256787172786459==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I set up a bunch of win 10 machines.
no issues.
fortunately no cortana involved.
In a office environment you can't have such a thing anyway.
Greetings,
Simon
Am 16.01.2019 um 16:13 schrieb Jared Stofflett:
> I have no problem with what was said on that podcast. As someone who's
> blind and just set up a new Windows laptop I find cortana's "a little
> wifi" spiel insulting. I would expect Narrator to start talking after
> some period of time, or if I don't want to wait just enable it with
> control+alt+win like normal.
>=20
> On 1/15/19, Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh wrote:
>> Thanks everyone. From Wednesday morning I would ask that everyone tweets
>> @Thurrott with the following:
>>
>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> You could write a message like this:
>>
>> Because Microsoft invested in accessibility, I can use SCCM to administer
>> thousands of workstations. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> Narrator in Windows 10 is becoming a very powerful screen reader.
>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> Because Microsoft works with companies like Freedom Scientific and NVAcces=
s,
>> Windows 10 is very accessible. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> I administer 104,000 users in active directory. It's fully accessible.
>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> I'm a full stack developer thanks to Visual studio. #AccessibilityWins
>> @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> Windows Weekly airs again tomorrow, Wednesday. I really want the messages
>> relating to accessibility to be clear in Paul's, Mary's and Leo's mind whi=
le
>> they sit down to present tomorrow's show.
>>
>> Feel free to ask people to retweet.
>>
>>
>> I agree that The OOB experience could be better.
>> And I know I don't need to say it but just for the benefit of others, the
>> points I was making weren't related to the OOB. Certain people who disagr=
ee
>> with me are trying to conflate my points to associate them with frustratio=
ns
>> around OOB but my issues are with how Paul attacked accessibility. Not the
>> way he attacked the OOB.
>>
>> I'm just saying this again here. Not because I think people are
>> misunderstanding me but because I have been misunderstood, sometimes
>> intentionally on some other forums.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Hodgson
>> Sent: Monday 14 January 2019 20:57
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry only just got around to this now - I don't really listen to many
>> podcasts so had to make a bit of time.
>>
>> I originally thought this was the Windows 10 RE mode speech we were talking
>> about but we were talking about the OOBE. I am not sure what the end
>> decision is on the talking OOBE now, but I agree that the way they
>> implemented it was probably a bit dumb in the sense that everyone else I
>> know of hates the thing and wants to get rid of it. Also if you try and u=
se
>> it without enabling Narrator you will have a tough time, so I think it nee=
ds
>> addressing. However the podcast was totally wrong and the comments made
>> were at best misguided and at worse will only serve to clarify people's
>> misguided opinion on what people with little or no sight can do on a
>> computer.
>>
>> I am not sure what the state of the talking OOBE will be going forward, but
>> I like the way Apple do this after a while of silence, and then only giving
>> the minimum of noise.
>>
>> If I can find it the BCAB (presenter me!) did a presentation on installing
>> Windows from a completely blank disk and everyone was extremely pleased wi=
th
>> the work that MS did. However I did do a survey afterwards about how many
>> people would try this on their own and in a room of 40 people only 2 said
>> they would try it actively which although I wasn't surprised, it did make =
me
>> feel a bit sad.
>>
>> Andrew.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Barry Toner
>> Sent: 14 January 2019 20:32
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind
>> Association discussion list. It is important that word is gotten out ther=
e,
>> and that people contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our voice is
>> heard. This is an utter disgrace. I've just about calmed down, after a
>> few hours and a fair number of cigarettes.
>>
>> Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing this. =
As
>> I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect
>> change the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this. It's important that we
>> contact them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG and
>> accompanying comments.
>>
>> Barry.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo
>> directly.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Barry Toner
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
>> To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
>>
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.
>> While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them,
>> accessibility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more blind
>> sys admins than most people realize. But having to call someone over to he=
lp
>> you install Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial thing. =
it
>> is a matter of whether you can actually perform the job you were hired to =
do
>> or not. There aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows that
>> can change the careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole class of
>> people.
>>
>>
>> Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't make =
it
>> harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical bug
>> doesn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job market.
>>
>>
>> On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me
>>> a couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>>>
>>> Andrew.
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
>>> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>>
>>> Thanks for highlighting this.
>>>
>>> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was
>>> very wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him
>>> on Wednesday.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
>>> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
>>> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original
>>> podcast is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large
>>> number of negative statements against accessibility for the vision
>>> impaired in windows. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the
>>> below podcast does an excellent job in highlighting the errors.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
>>> ott-is
>>> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
>=20
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--===============7895256787172786459==--
From jheim@math.wisc.edu Wed Jan 16 16:35:49 2019
From: John G Heim
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:35:29 -0600
Message-ID: <3a51f772-d129-191b-f0b4-aef0b2e03171@math.wisc.edu>
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8380139006711045180=="
--===============8380139006711045180==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You are a blind sys admin and you don't have a problem with the guy=20
saying blind people should just get help when they need to install Windows?
On 1/16/19 9:13 AM, Jared Stofflett wrote:
> I have no problem with what was said on that podcast. As someone who's
> blind and just set up a new Windows laptop I find cortana's "a little
> wifi" spiel insulting. I would expect Narrator to start talking after
> some period of time, or if I don't want to wait just enable it with
> control+alt+win like normal.
>=20
> On 1/15/19, Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh wrote:
>> Thanks everyone. From Wednesday morning I would ask that everyone tweets
>> @Thurrott with the following:
>>
>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> You could write a message like this:
>>
>> Because Microsoft invested in accessibility, I can use SCCM to administer
>> thousands of workstations. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> Narrator in Windows 10 is becoming a very powerful screen reader.
>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> Because Microsoft works with companies like Freedom Scientific and NVAcces=
s,
>> Windows 10 is very accessible. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> I administer 104,000 users in active directory. It's fully accessible.
>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> I'm a full stack developer thanks to Visual studio. #AccessibilityWins
>> @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>
>> Windows Weekly airs again tomorrow, Wednesday. I really want the messages
>> relating to accessibility to be clear in Paul's, Mary's and Leo's mind whi=
le
>> they sit down to present tomorrow's show.
>>
>> Feel free to ask people to retweet.
>>
>>
>> I agree that The OOB experience could be better.
>> And I know I don't need to say it but just for the benefit of others, the
>> points I was making weren't related to the OOB. Certain people who disagr=
ee
>> with me are trying to conflate my points to associate them with frustratio=
ns
>> around OOB but my issues are with how Paul attacked accessibility. Not the
>> way he attacked the OOB.
>>
>> I'm just saying this again here. Not because I think people are
>> misunderstanding me but because I have been misunderstood, sometimes
>> intentionally on some other forums.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Hodgson
>> Sent: Monday 14 January 2019 20:57
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry only just got around to this now - I don't really listen to many
>> podcasts so had to make a bit of time.
>>
>> I originally thought this was the Windows 10 RE mode speech we were talking
>> about but we were talking about the OOBE. I am not sure what the end
>> decision is on the talking OOBE now, but I agree that the way they
>> implemented it was probably a bit dumb in the sense that everyone else I
>> know of hates the thing and wants to get rid of it. Also if you try and u=
se
>> it without enabling Narrator you will have a tough time, so I think it nee=
ds
>> addressing. However the podcast was totally wrong and the comments made
>> were at best misguided and at worse will only serve to clarify people's
>> misguided opinion on what people with little or no sight can do on a
>> computer.
>>
>> I am not sure what the state of the talking OOBE will be going forward, but
>> I like the way Apple do this after a while of silence, and then only giving
>> the minimum of noise.
>>
>> If I can find it the BCAB (presenter me!) did a presentation on installing
>> Windows from a completely blank disk and everyone was extremely pleased wi=
th
>> the work that MS did. However I did do a survey afterwards about how many
>> people would try this on their own and in a room of 40 people only 2 said
>> they would try it actively which although I wasn't surprised, it did make =
me
>> feel a bit sad.
>>
>> Andrew.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Barry Toner
>> Sent: 14 January 2019 20:32
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind
>> Association discussion list. It is important that word is gotten out ther=
e,
>> and that people contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our voice is
>> heard. This is an utter disgrace. I've just about calmed down, after a
>> few hours and a fair number of cigarettes.
>>
>> Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing this. =
As
>> I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect
>> change the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this. It's important that we
>> contact them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG and
>> accompanying comments.
>>
>> Barry.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo
>> directly.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Barry Toner
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
>> To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
>>
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
>> To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>
>> I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.
>> While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them,
>> accessibility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more blind
>> sys admins than most people realize. But having to call someone over to he=
lp
>> you install Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial thing. =
it
>> is a matter of whether you can actually perform the job you were hired to =
do
>> or not. There aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows that
>> can change the careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole class of
>> people.
>>
>>
>> Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't make =
it
>> harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical bug
>> doesn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job market.
>>
>>
>> On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded to me
>>> a couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>>>
>>> Andrew.
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
>>> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>>
>>> Thanks for highlighting this.
>>>
>>> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was
>>> very wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct him
>>> on Wednesday.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
>>> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
>>> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original
>>> podcast is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a large
>>> number of negative statements against accessibility for the vision
>>> impaired in windows. They are design to get an reaction. The host of the
>>> below podcast does an excellent job in highlighting the errors.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
>>> ott-is
>>> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily=
.org
>=20
--===============8380139006711045180==--
From simon.eigeldinger@vol.at Wed Jan 16 16:44:25 2019
From: Simon Eigeldinger
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:44:03 +0100
Message-ID: <3602f302-da89-2aaa-04f8-7357d299556f@vol.at>
In-Reply-To: <3a51f772-d129-191b-f0b4-aef0b2e03171@math.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2224620813494106702=="
--===============2224620813494106702==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I remember another story where Leo and the team had the same incident
but with another subject.
i have the feeling those people have something against accessibility and
disabled people in general.
Am 16.01.2019 um 17:35 schrieb John G Heim:
> You are a blind sys admin and you don't have a problem with the guy
> saying blind people should just get help when they need to install Windows?
>
>
> On 1/16/19 9:13 AM, Jared Stofflett wrote:
>> I have no problem with what was said on that podcast. As someone who's
>> blind and just set up a new Windows laptop I find cortana's "a little
>> wifi" spiel insulting. I would expect Narrator to start talking after
>> some period of time, or if I don't want to wait just enable it with
>> control+alt+win like normal.
>>
>> On 1/15/19, Darragh Ó Héiligh wrote:
>>> Thanks everyone. From Wednesday morning I would ask that everyone tweets
>>> @Thurrott with the following:
>>>
>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>
>>> You could write a message like this:
>>>
>>> Because Microsoft invested in accessibility, I can use SCCM to
>>> administer
>>> thousands of workstations. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
>>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>
>>> Narrator in Windows 10 is becoming a very powerful screen reader.
>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>
>>> Because Microsoft works with companies like Freedom Scientific and
>>> NVAccess,
>>> Windows 10 is very accessible. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
>>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>
>>> I administer 104,000 users in active directory. It's fully accessible.
>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>
>>> I'm a full stack developer thanks to Visual studio. #AccessibilityWins
>>> @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>
>>> Windows Weekly airs again tomorrow, Wednesday. I really want the
>>> messages
>>> relating to accessibility to be clear in Paul's, Mary's and Leo's
>>> mind while
>>> they sit down to present tomorrow's show.
>>>
>>> Feel free to ask people to retweet.
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree that The OOB experience could be better.
>>> And I know I don't need to say it but just for the benefit of others,
>>> the
>>> points I was making weren't related to the OOB. Certain people who
>>> disagree
>>> with me are trying to conflate my points to associate them with
>>> frustrations
>>> around OOB but my issues are with how Paul attacked accessibility.
>>> Not the
>>> way he attacked the OOB.
>>>
>>> I'm just saying this again here. Not because I think people are
>>> misunderstanding me but because I have been misunderstood, sometimes
>>> intentionally on some other forums.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Andrew Hodgson
>>> Sent: Monday 14 January 2019 20:57
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>> win.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry only just got around to this now - I don't really listen to many
>>> podcasts so had to make a bit of time.
>>>
>>> I originally thought this was the Windows 10 RE mode speech we were
>>> talking
>>> about but we were talking about the OOBE. I am not sure what the end
>>> decision is on the talking OOBE now, but I agree that the way they
>>> implemented it was probably a bit dumb in the sense that everyone else I
>>> know of hates the thing and wants to get rid of it. Also if you try
>>> and use
>>> it without enabling Narrator you will have a tough time, so I think
>>> it needs
>>> addressing. However the podcast was totally wrong and the comments made
>>> were at best misguided and at worse will only serve to clarify people's
>>> misguided opinion on what people with little or no sight can do on a
>>> computer.
>>>
>>> I am not sure what the state of the talking OOBE will be going
>>> forward, but
>>> I like the way Apple do this after a while of silence, and then only
>>> giving
>>> the minimum of noise.
>>>
>>> If I can find it the BCAB (presenter me!) did a presentation on
>>> installing
>>> Windows from a completely blank disk and everyone was extremely
>>> pleased with
>>> the work that MS did. However I did do a survey afterwards about how
>>> many
>>> people would try this on their own and in a room of 40 people only 2
>>> said
>>> they would try it actively which although I wasn't surprised, it did
>>> make me
>>> feel a bit sad.
>>>
>>> Andrew.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Barry Toner
>>> Sent: 14 January 2019 20:32
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>> win.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind
>>> Association discussion list. It is important that word is gotten out
>>> there,
>>> and that people contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our
>>> voice is
>>> heard. This is an utter disgrace. I've just about calmed down,
>>> after a
>>> few hours and a fair number of cigarettes.
>>>
>>> Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing
>>> this. As
>>> I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect
>>> change the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this. It's important
>>> that we
>>> contact them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG and
>>> accompanying comments.
>>>
>>> Barry.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>> win.
>>>
>>> I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo
>>> directly.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Barry Toner
>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
>>> To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
>>>
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>> win.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
>>>
>>> Barry
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
>>> To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>> win.
>>>
>>> I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.
>>> While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them,
>>> accessibility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more
>>> blind
>>> sys admins than most people realize. But having to call someone over
>>> to help
>>> you install Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial
>>> thing. it
>>> is a matter of whether you can actually perform the job you were
>>> hired to do
>>> or not. There aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows
>>> that
>>> can change the careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole
>>> class of
>>> people.
>>>
>>>
>>> Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't
>>> make it
>>> harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical
>>> bug
>>> doesn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job market.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded
>>>> to me
>>>> a couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew.
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Darragh Ó Héiligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
>>>> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>> win.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for highlighting this.
>>>>
>>>> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott was
>>>> very wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct
>>>> him
>>>> on Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
>>>> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
>>>> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original
>>>> podcast is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a
>>>> large
>>>> number of negative statements against accessibility for the vision
>>>> impaired in windows. They are design to get an reaction. The host of
>>>> the
>>>> below podcast does an excellent job in highlighting the errors.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
>>>> ott-is
>>>> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--===============2224620813494106702==--
From stofflet@gmail.com Wed Jan 16 18:08:39 2019
From: Jared Stofflett
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:08:21 -0500
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <3602f302-da89-2aaa-04f8-7357d299556f@vol.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8898782919899991723=="
--===============8898782919899991723==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Given his experience with accessibility I have no issue with him
saying blind people should get sited help installing Windows. Kortana
does not come up talking about narrator, it comes up with a demeaning
your to dumb to set up a computer on your own so I'm going to hold
your hand and walk you through everything spiel. Because of this he
would have no way of knowing that Narrator is a good screen reader and
that it can be used to do Windows setup. I'd have a bigger issue if
Microsoft had actually done a compitant job with first run and install
accessibility such as Apple. There's no reason your computer should
start shouting at you with a dumb personality. If the implimentation
was that Narrator started speaking five minutes after install started
assuming there was no user action up to that point and the hosts were
complaining about that then I would be willing to consider that they
were against accessibility. Currently there just against crappy
accessibility implimentations that make Windows less usable for the
vast majority of users including me.
On 1/16/19, Simon Eigeldinger wrote:
> I remember another story where Leo and the team had the same incident
> but with another subject.
> i have the feeling those people have something against accessibility and
> disabled people in general.
>
>
> Am 16.01.2019 um 17:35 schrieb John G Heim:
>> You are a blind sys admin and you don't have a problem with the guy
>> saying blind people should just get help when they need to install
>> Windows?
>>
>>
>> On 1/16/19 9:13 AM, Jared Stofflett wrote:
>>> I have no problem with what was said on that podcast. As someone who's
>>> blind and just set up a new Windows laptop I find cortana's "a little
>>> wifi" spiel insulting. I would expect Narrator to start talking after
>>> some period of time, or if I don't want to wait just enable it with
>>> control+alt+win like normal.
>>>
>>> On 1/15/19, Darragh Ó Héiligh wrote:
>>>> Thanks everyone. From Wednesday morning I would ask that everyone
>>>> tweets
>>>> @Thurrott with the following:
>>>>
>>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>
>>>> You could write a message like this:
>>>>
>>>> Because Microsoft invested in accessibility, I can use SCCM to
>>>> administer
>>>> thousands of workstations. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
>>>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>
>>>> Narrator in Windows 10 is becoming a very powerful screen reader.
>>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>
>>>> Because Microsoft works with companies like Freedom Scientific and
>>>> NVAccess,
>>>> Windows 10 is very accessible. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT
>>>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>
>>>> I administer 104,000 users in active directory. It's fully accessible.
>>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>
>>>> I'm a full stack developer thanks to Visual studio. #AccessibilityWins
>>>> @Thurrott @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>
>>>> Windows Weekly airs again tomorrow, Wednesday. I really want the
>>>> messages
>>>> relating to accessibility to be clear in Paul's, Mary's and Leo's
>>>> mind while
>>>> they sit down to present tomorrow's show.
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to ask people to retweet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree that The OOB experience could be better.
>>>> And I know I don't need to say it but just for the benefit of others,
>>>> the
>>>> points I was making weren't related to the OOB. Certain people who
>>>> disagree
>>>> with me are trying to conflate my points to associate them with
>>>> frustrations
>>>> around OOB but my issues are with how Paul attacked accessibility.
>>>> Not the
>>>> way he attacked the OOB.
>>>>
>>>> I'm just saying this again here. Not because I think people are
>>>> misunderstanding me but because I have been misunderstood, sometimes
>>>> intentionally on some other forums.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Andrew Hodgson
>>>> Sent: Monday 14 January 2019 20:57
>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>> win.
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry only just got around to this now - I don't really listen to many
>>>> podcasts so had to make a bit of time.
>>>>
>>>> I originally thought this was the Windows 10 RE mode speech we were
>>>> talking
>>>> about but we were talking about the OOBE. I am not sure what the end
>>>> decision is on the talking OOBE now, but I agree that the way they
>>>> implemented it was probably a bit dumb in the sense that everyone else
>>>> I
>>>> know of hates the thing and wants to get rid of it. Also if you try
>>>> and use
>>>> it without enabling Narrator you will have a tough time, so I think
>>>> it needs
>>>> addressing. However the podcast was totally wrong and the comments
>>>> made
>>>> were at best misguided and at worse will only serve to clarify people's
>>>> misguided opinion on what people with little or no sight can do on a
>>>> computer.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure what the state of the talking OOBE will be going
>>>> forward, but
>>>> I like the way Apple do this after a while of silence, and then only
>>>> giving
>>>> the minimum of noise.
>>>>
>>>> If I can find it the BCAB (presenter me!) did a presentation on
>>>> installing
>>>> Windows from a completely blank disk and everyone was extremely
>>>> pleased with
>>>> the work that MS did. However I did do a survey afterwards about how
>>>> many
>>>> people would try this on their own and in a room of 40 people only 2
>>>> said
>>>> they would try it actively which although I wasn't surprised, it did
>>>> make me
>>>> feel a bit sad.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Barry Toner
>>>> Sent: 14 January 2019 20:32
>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>> win.
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind
>>>> Association discussion list. It is important that word is gotten out
>>>> there,
>>>> and that people contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our
>>>> voice is
>>>> heard. This is an utter disgrace. I've just about calmed down,
>>>> after a
>>>> few hours and a fair number of cigarettes.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing
>>>> this. As
>>>> I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect
>>>> change the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this. It's important
>>>> that we
>>>> contact them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG
>>>> and
>>>> accompanying comments.
>>>>
>>>> Barry.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>> win.
>>>>
>>>> I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo
>>>> directly.
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>>
>>>> Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Barry Toner
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
>>>> To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
>>>>
>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>> win.
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've submitted a reply on your BLOG. I hope it went through OK.
>>>>
>>>> Barry
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>> win.
>>>>
>>>> I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.
>>>> While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them,
>>>> accessibility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more
>>>> blind
>>>> sys admins than most people realize. But having to call someone over
>>>> to help
>>>> you install Windows, as the podcaster suggested, is not a trivial
>>>> thing. it
>>>> is a matter of whether you can actually perform the job you were
>>>> hired to do
>>>> or not. There aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows
>>>> that
>>>> can change the careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole
>>>> class of
>>>> people.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't
>>>> make it
>>>> harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical
>>>> bug
>>>> doesn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job
>>>> market.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet? He has responded
>>>>> to me
>>>>> a couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew.
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> From: Darragh Ó Héiligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
>>>>> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
>>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>>> win.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for highlighting this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott
>>>>> was
>>>>> very wrong in what he was saying. I'm hoping that they will correct
>>>>> him
>>>>> on Wednesday.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
>>>>> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
>>>>> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'
>>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
>>>>>
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The below podcast I would suggest you have a listen too. The original
>>>>> podcast is from Windows weekly episode 603 where this host makes a
>>>>> large
>>>>> number of negative statements against accessibility for the vision
>>>>> impaired in windows. They are design to get an reaction. The host of
>>>>> the
>>>>> below podcast does an excellent job in highlighting the errors.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.digitaldarragh.com/2019/01/10/windows-weekly-603-paul-thurr
>>>>> ott-is
>>>>> -so-very-wrong/#comment-49688
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list --
>>>>> blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>
> ---
> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-sysadmins mailing list -- blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> blind-sysadmins-leave(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org
>
--===============8898782919899991723==--
From stofflet@gmail.com Wed Jan 16 18:40:01 2019
From: Jared Stofflett
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Examples of unattended Windows server 2019
installations with SSH enabled?
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:39:47 -0500
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0411778004136896488=="
--===============0411778004136896488==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Does anyone have examples of automated installs of Windows Server 2019
that have SSH enabled when the install is completed? I'd like to build
some 2019 VM's using Packer and it would be a lot easier to access
them over SSH then dealing with winrm since they will not be joined to
a domain.
--===============0411778004136896488==--
From thergert@vision-forward.org Wed Jan 16 19:36:31 2019
From: Troy Hergert
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] IOS app for managing active directory
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:36:10 +0000
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1887596665752120859=="
--===============1887596665752120859==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
Apologies if this get's through twice. I never saw my first attempt get thro=
ugh.
I was looking into the IOS app called Active Directory Assist. Does anyone h=
ave any experience managing AD from an IOS app. I tried the light version of=
this app and find that it makes you search for AD objects and you must get t=
he name right. I was hoping the pro version would actually list the objects =
in the domain and not make you search for them. Basically I was hoping to fi=
nd an app that allowed me to do some basic AD tasks, like resetting passwords=
, unlocking accounts, adding people to groups etc. Thought I'd check with yo=
u all before I spent the $20 on the pro version of the app.
Thanks.
Troy
###
###
--===============1887596665752120859==--
From jheim@math.wisc.edu Wed Jan 16 21:19:00 2019
From: John G Heim
To: blind-sysadmins@lists.hodgsonfamily.org
Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a win.
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:18:36 -0600
Message-ID: <434a53e5-ce75-4520-d34c-1a11ce12517b@math.wisc.edu>
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4623885786817466594=="
--===============4623885786817466594==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Even if I grant that Kortana is annoying, what has that got to do with=20
the suggestion that a blind sys admin ought to get help doing his job? I=20
gotta say, if the guy had just said that Kortana is annoying, I doubt it=20
would have come up on this list.
On 1/16/19 12:08 PM, Jared Stofflett wrote:
> Given his experience with accessibility I have no issue with him
> saying blind people should get sited help installing Windows. Kortana
> does not come up talking about narrator, it comes up with a demeaning
> your to dumb to set up a computer on your own so I'm going to hold
> your hand and walk you through everything spiel. Because of this he
> would have no way of knowing that Narrator is a good screen reader and
> that it can be used to do Windows setup. I'd have a bigger issue if
> Microsoft had actually done a compitant job with first run and install
> accessibility such as Apple. There's no reason your computer should
> start shouting at you with a dumb personality. If the implimentation
> was that Narrator started speaking five minutes after install started
> assuming there was no user action up to that point and the hosts were
> complaining about that then I would be willing to consider that they
> were against accessibility. Currently there just against crappy
> accessibility implimentations that make Windows less usable for the
> vast majority of users including me.
>=20
> On 1/16/19, Simon Eigeldinger wrote:
>> I remember another story where Leo and the team had the same incident
>> but with another subject.
>> i have the feeling those people have something against accessibility and
>> disabled people in general.
>>
>>
>> Am 16.01.2019 um 17:35 schrieb John G Heim:
>>> You are a blind sys admin and you don't have a problem with the guy
>>> saying blind people should just get help when they need to install
>>> Windows?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/16/19 9:13 AM, Jared Stofflett wrote:
>>>> I have no problem with what was said on that podcast. As someone who's
>>>> blind and just set up a new Windows laptop I find cortana's "a little
>>>> wifi" spiel insulting. I would expect Narrator to start talking after
>>>> some period of time, or if I don't want to wait just enable it with
>>>> control+alt+win like normal.
>>>>
>>>> On 1/15/19, Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh wrote:
>>>>> Thanks everyone. From Wednesday morning I would ask that everyone
>>>>> tweets
>>>>> @Thurrott with the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott=C2=A0 @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>>
>>>>> You could write a message like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Because Microsoft invested in accessibility, I can use SCCM to
>>>>> administer
>>>>> thousands of workstations. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott=C2=A0 @TWiT
>>>>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>>
>>>>> Narrator in Windows 10 is becoming a very powerful screen reader.
>>>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott=C2=A0 @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>>
>>>>> Because Microsoft works with companies like Freedom Scientific and
>>>>> NVAccess,
>>>>> Windows 10 is very accessible. #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott=C2=A0 @TWiT
>>>>> #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>>
>>>>> I administer 104,000 users in active directory. It's fully accessible.
>>>>> #AccessibilityWins @Thurrott=C2=A0 @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm a full stack developer thanks to Visual studio. #AccessibilityWins
>>>>> @Thurrott=C2=A0 @TWiT #WindowsWeekly #LeoLaporte
>>>>>
>>>>> Windows Weekly airs again tomorrow, Wednesday.=C2=A0 I really want the
>>>>> messages
>>>>> relating to accessibility to be clear in Paul's, Mary's and Leo's
>>>>> mind while
>>>>> they sit down to present tomorrow's show.
>>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to ask people to retweet.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree that The OOB experience could be better.
>>>>> And I know I don't need to say it but just for the benefit of others,
>>>>> the
>>>>> points I was making weren't related to the OOB.=C2=A0 Certain people who
>>>>> disagree
>>>>> with me are trying to conflate my points to associate them with
>>>>> frustrations
>>>>> around OOB but my issues are with how Paul attacked accessibility.
>>>>> Not the
>>>>> way he attacked the OOB.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm just saying this again here. Not because I think people are
>>>>> misunderstanding me but because I have been misunderstood, sometimes
>>>>> intentionally on some other forums.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Andrew Hodgson
>>>>> Sent: Monday 14 January 2019 20:57
>>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>>> win.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry only just got around to this now - I don't really listen to many
>>>>> podcasts so had to make a bit of time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I originally thought this was the Windows 10 RE mode speech we were
>>>>> talking
>>>>> about but we were talking about the OOBE.=C2=A0 I am not sure what the =
end
>>>>> decision is on the talking OOBE now, but I agree that the way they
>>>>> implemented it was probably a bit dumb in the sense that everyone else
>>>>> I
>>>>> know of hates the thing and wants to get rid of it.=C2=A0 Also if you t=
ry
>>>>> and use
>>>>> it without enabling Narrator you will have a tough time, so I think
>>>>> it needs
>>>>> addressing.=C2=A0 However the podcast was totally wrong and the comments
>>>>> made
>>>>> were at best misguided and at worse will only serve to clarify people's
>>>>> misguided opinion on what people with little or no sight can do on a
>>>>> computer.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure what the state of the talking OOBE will be going
>>>>> forward, but
>>>>> I like the way Apple do this after a while of silence, and then only
>>>>> giving
>>>>> the minimum of noise.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I can find it the BCAB (presenter me!) did a presentation on
>>>>> installing
>>>>> Windows from a completely blank disk and everyone was extremely
>>>>> pleased with
>>>>> the work that MS did.=C2=A0 However I did do a survey afterwards about =
how
>>>>> many
>>>>> people would try this on their own and in a room of 40 people only 2
>>>>> said
>>>>> they would try it actively which although I wasn't surprised, it did
>>>>> make me
>>>>> feel a bit sad.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Barry Toner
>>>>> Sent: 14 January 2019 20:32
>>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>>> win.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have reposted Daragh's link to the British Computer Of The Blind
>>>>> Association discussion list.=C2=A0 It is important that word is gotten =
out
>>>>> there,
>>>>> and that people contact Paul, Leo and the team at TWIT.tv and our
>>>>> voice is
>>>>> heard.=C2=A0 This is an utter disgrace.=C2=A0=C2=A0 I've just about cal=
med down,
>>>>> after a
>>>>> few hours and a fair number of cigarettes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you so so much Darragh for picking up on this and addressing
>>>>> this.=C2=A0 As
>>>>> I've said on the BCAB list, talking on the lists is grand but to effect
>>>>> change the guys at TWIT.tv need to hear about this.=C2=A0 It's important
>>>>> that we
>>>>> contact them directly and that the powers that be see Darragh's BLOG
>>>>> and
>>>>> accompanying comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> Barry.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Billy Irwin [mailto:billy.irwin(a)outlook.com]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 5:12 PM
>>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>>> win.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also submitted something to your blog and also sent an email to Leo
>>>>> directly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>>
>>>>> Billy L. Irwin - K9OH
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Barry Toner
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 12:10 PM
>>>>> To: jheim(a)math.wisc.edu; Blind sysadmins list
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>>> win.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've submitted a reply on your BLOG.=C2=A0 I hope it went through OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Barry
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: John G Heim [mailto:jheim(a)math.wisc.edu]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:36 PM
>>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list; Andrew Hodgson
>>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>>> win.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this issue highlights a point I'veen trying to make for years.
>>>>> While the number of blind sys admins might be fairly small, to them,
>>>>> accessibility is extremely important. There probably are a lot more
>>>>> blind
>>>>> sys admins than most people realize. But having to call someone over
>>>>> to help
>>>>> you install Windows, as the podcaster suggested,=C2=A0 is not a trivial
>>>>> thing. it
>>>>> is a matter of whether you can actually perform the job you were
>>>>> hired to do
>>>>> or not. There aren't that many tweeks Microsoft can make to Windows
>>>>> that
>>>>> can change the careers, and therefore the very lives, of a whole
>>>>> class of
>>>>> people.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Accessibility problems aren't like other bugs. A typical bug doesn't
>>>>> make it
>>>>> harder for one guy to keep his job compared to another guy. A typical
>>>>> bug
>>>>> doesn't put a whole class of people at a disadvantage in the job
>>>>> market.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/14/19 5:21 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have you had any response to paul on Twitter yet?=C2=A0 He has respond=
ed
>>>>>> to me
>>>>>> a couple of times there, but this is a different point entirely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew.
>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>> From: Darragh =C3=93 H=C3=A9iligh [d(a)digitaldarragh.com]
>>>>>> Sent: 14 January 2019 11:16
>>>>>> To: Blind sysadmins list
>>>>>> Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] Re: Podcast on why accessibility is not a
>>>>>> win.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for highlighting this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I recorded this to hopefully get the message out that Paul Thurrott
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> very wrong in what he was saying.=C2=A0 I'm hoping that they will corr=
ect
>>>>>> him
>>>>>> on Wednesday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: mhysnm1964(a)gmail.com
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday 13 January 2019 23:26
>>>>>> To: 'Blind sysadmins list'