- Blind-sysadmins - lists.hodgsonfamily.org

installing vmware esx
by John Heim 30 Jul '08

30 Jul '08

Anybody know if it's possible to install vmware esx if you're blind? I have already tried modifying the boot CD to have a serial console and I've booted a normal CD with a PC Weasel card. In case you haven't heard of it, the weasel acts like a VGA card except that instead of VGA output it has a serial port. So you can use a null modem cable and a terminal emulator on another computer to get text output. I booted from a vmware esx installation CD and entered 'text' at the boot prompt to start a text install. But the weasel is still indicating that it is getting a command to go into graphics mode. I suspect the vmware text install isn't a real text install. -- John Heim jheim(a)math.wisc.edu / 608-263-4189 "An operator of a vehicle shall stop the vehicle before approaching closer than 10 feet to a pedestrian who is using a service animal" -- Wisconsin Statute 2005 Act 354,

2 5

Sage
by Andrew Hodgson 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

Hi George. If Sage is slow on the server as well as the remote clients, is there any chance that there may be a corruption in one of the files making up the database, or the internal database needs compacting? Have you tried this with a blank totally new database, with some figures in? Have you tried doing a new install of Sage onto a clean desktop, forgetting the server, and working in this mode for a while? Andrew.

2 2

FW: [program-l] MS Process Monitor + Fast IO disallowed
by Andrew Hodgson 25 Jul '08

25 Jul '08

Hi, Resending as admin - originally sent to the bounce address. Andrew. From: George Bell [mailto:george@techno-vision.co.uk] Sent: 25 July 2008 21:07 To: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org Subject: FW: [program-l] MS Process Monitor + Fast IO disallowed I've posted the following on Program-l, but wondered if any of you guys had some ideas here? George. I'm trying to resolve some performance issues with our SAGE Line 50 accounting system. Having installed Microsoft's Process Monitor on my Vista Ultimate system, I can see that during something as mundane as an Invoice date sort, FAST IO DISALLOWED appears. There doesn't seem to be much practical advice around for determining what might turn FAST IO on or off. Some say it could be malware, others that it could be virus checkers and such like. (We do run McAfee here) FWIW, I'm running a Windows Enterprise Server 2003, a plain vanilla Windows Server 2003, one Vista Ultimate workstation, and the rest are XP workstations. Has anybody any thoughts, because I've already lost my part-time bookkeeper due his frustrations over performance? George.

2 3

Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager Console
by Toner, Barry (LIT) 10 Jul '08

10 Jul '08

Guys, Has anyone tried using this with a screenreader? We're slowly rolling it out and I've just tried using the Admin Console. It's a Java app that just will not read at all with either Win Eyes v6.1 or Jaws 8. The title bar will read but it looks as if it's a transparent window to the screenreader. For example when you launch the application there's text fields that the screenreader doesn't' see at all. Keyboard commands appear to work in as much as tab, return etc. However, there's no speech feedback whatsoever. >From what little I know this product is a mix-mash of Symantec and Sygate and they're running on two different servers. Apache for Symantec's, and IIS for Sygate's firewall. It's not possible to log into either server using Putty or the Windows XP console. Comments? Barry. "Tell me and I will hear, show me and I will see, involve me and I will understand. Chinese Proverb" Barry Toner Placement Systems Engineer Liberty Information Technology Direct Line: 02890 167000 Adelaide Exchange Fax: 02890 445511 24-26 Adelaide Street Switchboard: 02890 445500 Belfast BT2 8GD Email: b.toner(a)liberty-it.co.uk

3 3

Exchange deployment
by Andrew Hodgson 09 Jul '08

09 Jul '08

Hi, Have any of you guys out there been involved in an Exchange 2007 deployment? Just going through the options now. It is huge! Andrew. -- allpay.net Limited, Fortis et Fides, Whitestone Business Park, Whitestone, Hereford, HR1 3SE. Registered in England No. 02933191. UK VAT Reg. No. 666 9148 88. Telephone: 0870 243 3434, Fax: 0870 243 6041. Website: www.allpay.net Email: enquiries(a)allpay.net This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the allpay.net Information Security Manager at the number above.

1 0

network question?
by romance's prince 05 Jul '08

05 Jul '08

hello members: I've small home network in my home, using it to get DSL connection. we have Conexant router. this is its info: BootCode Version: BC_CX82xxx_4.1.0.21 Firmware Version: CX82xxx_4.1.0.21_S Customer Software Version: 4.1.0.21_ please I've some questions: 1. how can I know the computers that are online now on network? net view command now not working. also when I go to Entire Network, then press Microsoft windows network the computer not talk, and should use end now to be healthy again. why this option not working now? and how I fix this? 2. is there any way make me prevent any virus or spy move from the network to me? am not share any files or folder for anyone. thanks. ibraam.

4 5

Question for you Cisco ASA/router experts out there
by Andrew Hodgson 04 Jul '08

04 Jul '08

Hi all, I am trying to reconfigure my network so that it meets the following requirements: At present I have 2 sets of public IP addresses. I have a block of 2 addresses (/30), which is used for the inside address of the router, and the outside address of the firewall. I have another block of /28 (14 usable addresses), which is the inside of the firewall. There is no NAT. What I want to do is to get rid of the /30, and use one of the IP addresses in the /28 as the inside address of the Internet router, and then the firewall has the rest for the outside network. I will have an internal (inside) IP range of 192.168.1.x, and the firewall will NAT everything going out on that connection to the outside interface (using one IP address). I will have servers (specific IP addresses) on the inside network which I want natted to other static IP addresses on the outside network. There will be static NAT statements which do the same as port forwarding, but I want any connection that these machines make to come from specific external IP addresses. Here is my sketch configuration illustrating this. Will it work, or do I need to use policy NAT with ACLs? Thanks. Andrew. Router (Cisco 837) interface Ethernet0 ip address xx.xx.xx.209 255.255.255.240 interface Dialer0 ip address negotiated (receives WAN static) Firewall (ASA 5505) interface vlan2 nameif outside security-level 0 ip address xx.xx.xx.210 255.255.255.240 interface vlan1 nameif inside ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 security-level 100 global (outside) 1 interface global (outside) 2 xx.xx.xx.11-xx.xx.xx.222 netmask 255.255.255.240 nat (inside) 1 0 0 route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xx.xx.xx.209 1 (can this go in the outside interface definition?) access-group outside_access_in in interface outside access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any host 192.168.1.10 eq 25 static (inside,outside) xx.xx.xx.211 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.240 Thanks. Andrew.

3 6

Remote Access
by Toner, Barry (LIT) 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

Folks, I've never done this and really want to get some practice with it. Can anyone either tell me or point me to step by step instructions on every single thing I need to do. XP Machine to XP machine, and I was going to use Window Eyes. Thanks, Barry. "Tell me and I will hear, show me and I will see, involve me and I will understand. Chinese Proverb" Barry Toner Placement Systems Engineer Liberty Information Technology Direct Line: 02890 167000 Adelaide Exchange Fax: 02890 445511 24-26 Adelaide Street Switchboard: 02890 445500 Belfast BT2 8GD Email: b.toner(a)liberty-it.co.uk

2 1

Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage
by Ryan Shugart 28 Jun '08

28 Jun '08

Not yet, but I think my company will want me to play with it, since they're antisan as well, I'll let you know. Ryan -----Original Message----- From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew(a)hodgsonfamily.org> To: "Blind sysadmins list" <blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org> Sent: 6/28/2008 9:00 AM Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Hi, Have you any experience with this package? Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Shugart Sent: 28 June 2008 14:57 To: Blind sysadmins list Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Andrew: Have you taken a look at a product called San Melody? Its much cheaper than conventional SANs since it runs ontop of regular Windows servers, but it's a lot cheaper, and I believe is targeted at your situation. Its no Netapp by any means, but its still better than nothing. http://www.datacore.com/products/prod_SANmelody.asp Ryan -----Original Message----- From: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hodgson Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 4:57 AM To: Blind sysadmins list Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Hi, Thanks for that. Of course I agree with you about the fact that we shouldn't be looking at price first and formost, but unfortunately the business is not behind us with the SAN purchase, so it inevitably comes into play. They did give me a budget which was seriously short of even the most basic NetAp filer, so I think we will have to stay with DAS solutions. We also have a big data centre refresh pending, so that may have to take priority. Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of JoeY Sent: 28 June 2008 00:42 To: 'Blind sysadmins list' Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Features and price is only a small factor when it comes to your companies data. I really like Netapp because with snapshot, snap mirror, iSCSI, and too many details under the hood to get into here, it provides the performance and redundancy that we need. I run Exchange, MS SQL over iSCSI to the Netapp, and there's also several Sybase NFS connections, as well as being our central CIFS server. It's been reliable, and if you scale it correctly, you can really throw a lot at it. We've outgrown the different models, from the 760's, 270, and 3020's. And now are looking at the 6000 series, not because of the throughput, but we need more connections to the filer heads. So, without writing a huge review, I like the Netapp. We previously looked at the EMC offerings, and they seemed overly complex. With Netapp, we had a clustered head, with several disk shelves for redundancy, and spindle count. To recreate this environment of redundancy, EMC offered an architecture that required three of their different server modules. We thought that in our environment, having one "controller" was so much more easier to manage. ~Joe -----Original Message----- From: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hodgson Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 6:17 PM To: Blind sysadmins list Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Hi, Just wondering if anyone out there is using any shared storage system? We are looking to possibly get one for the company, but I am interested in looking at other venders instead of EMC, NetAp, etc, mainly as you seem to be locked into using a lot of their other hardware, which leads to being quite expensive. It will probably have to be an iSCSI presentation. Thanks. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins

2 1

Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage
by Ryan Shugart 28 Jun '08

28 Jun '08

Not yet, but I think my company will want me to play with it, since they're antisan as well, I'll let you know. Ryan -----Original Message----- From: "Andrew Hodgson" <andrew(a)hodgsonfamily.org> To: "Blind sysadmins list" <blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org> Sent: 6/28/2008 9:00 AM Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Hi, Have you any experience with this package? Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Shugart Sent: 28 June 2008 14:57 To: Blind sysadmins list Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Andrew: Have you taken a look at a product called San Melody? Its much cheaper than conventional SANs since it runs ontop of regular Windows servers, but it's a lot cheaper, and I believe is targeted at your situation. Its no Netapp by any means, but its still better than nothing. http://www.datacore.com/products/prod_SANmelody.asp Ryan -----Original Message----- From: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hodgson Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 4:57 AM To: Blind sysadmins list Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Hi, Thanks for that. Of course I agree with you about the fact that we shouldn't be looking at price first and formost, but unfortunately the business is not behind us with the SAN purchase, so it inevitably comes into play. They did give me a budget which was seriously short of even the most basic NetAp filer, so I think we will have to stay with DAS solutions. We also have a big data centre refresh pending, so that may have to take priority. Andrew. -----Original Message----- From: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of JoeY Sent: 28 June 2008 00:42 To: 'Blind sysadmins list' Subject: Re: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Features and price is only a small factor when it comes to your companies data. I really like Netapp because with snapshot, snap mirror, iSCSI, and too many details under the hood to get into here, it provides the performance and redundancy that we need. I run Exchange, MS SQL over iSCSI to the Netapp, and there's also several Sybase NFS connections, as well as being our central CIFS server. It's been reliable, and if you scale it correctly, you can really throw a lot at it. We've outgrown the different models, from the 760's, 270, and 3020's. And now are looking at the 6000 series, not because of the throughput, but we need more connections to the filer heads. So, without writing a huge review, I like the Netapp. We previously looked at the EMC offerings, and they seemed overly complex. With Netapp, we had a clustered head, with several disk shelves for redundancy, and spindle count. To recreate this environment of redundancy, EMC offered an architecture that required three of their different server modules. We thought that in our environment, having one "controller" was so much more easier to manage. ~Joe -----Original Message----- From: blind-sysadmins-bounces(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org [mailto:blind-sysadmins-bounces@lists.hodgsonfamily.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hodgson Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 6:17 PM To: Blind sysadmins list Subject: [Blind-sysadmins] San/shared storage usage Hi, Just wondering if anyone out there is using any shared storage system? We are looking to possibly get one for the company, but I am interested in looking at other venders instead of EMC, NetAp, etc, mainly as you seem to be locked into using a lot of their other hardware, which leads to being quite expensive. It will probably have to be an iSCSI presentation. Thanks. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins _______________________________________________ Blind-sysadmins mailing list Blind-sysadmins(a)lists.hodgsonfamily.org http://lists.hodgsonfamily.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-sysadmins

1 0